I prefer not to argue with ignoramuses that don't accept other people's views because they're too ignorant to see any other ones but their own.
Ad hominem attacks now. You're stepping up.
But just so that this has a point let me get this straight. I am an ignoramus because I don't accept your views?
I see exactly what you are trying to convey and I think that you are wrong. I have backed up my arguments every single time and have not once resorted to name calling.
I think perhaps you might want to reconsider your last statement while looking in a mirror.
The parents comparison is a strange one to make, I didn't say or suggest that, what I said is that society should run so that people do not fall into poverty. No one is asking for the state to feed and clothes us, but it should be there to support us when - for whatever reason - we are not able to do that anymore.
I generally disagree. If it is to be a temporary solution then absolutely there should be a well functioning system that can help a person in need for a few months while they get back on their feet. No more than that though. Anything beyond that should indeed be covered by families, insurance plans or charities.
Not everyone wants to work, not everyone wants to pay their taxes. You okay with that? They choose ignorance and reliance and welfare, are you okay with that? Because you don't get to dictate how others should live their lives
If someone wants to not work, go ahead. Just don't expect anything out of life. You get what you put in, right?
Same with people on welfare. I don't like it but the only people they are hurting is themselves. One of my old roommates was on welfare not long ago. You know how much that guy brought in a month? Something like $550. His rent is $475. They want to stay on welfare? Rock on, it's your idiocy.
Do you not think that people who are on the bottom rung of employment, or indeed, are unemployed, have the same external responsibilities? And they have no money to fall back on. They require the state, they cant afford to put more in, even though they work hard, so maybe your friend who's on 250k might be happy to pay a little more considering people are having the same problem as him who HAVE to rely on the state to help them out.
They do and truth be told this is where I have problems with my view point and it's the feeling that always causes me to re-evaluate when presented with new perspectives.
Unfortunately I believe that we are in a Catch-22. Yes they do indeed deserve something. It is unfortunate that things like medical expenses can become out of control and could bankrupt a family. However, I also don't believe that we have the right to tell anyone to do with their money. This is why I am an advocate for charitable donations. It really bridges the gap between what the state can and should provide and individuals who want to help out their fellow man.