- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
- Messages
- 245,645
- Reaction score
- 76,839
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 38
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
Your question doesn't interest me.
You are voting a claimed BG. So my interest level in why is important.
Your question doesn't interest me.
This is so true. And literally ANYBODY that's not a complete novice knows there is overlap so it's entirely filler content. If anything I could see scum wanting to be quick to be the ones to point it out. Not worth town points at allLike that’s the kinda filler shit scum often say to look useful without actually being useful (like it’s literally in the OP) and means he doesn’t have to take any kind of stance. It’s just content
not saying he’s scum for doing it but such an odd reason to give someone a town read
Are you arguing that you've had conviction in your reads?
Ultimately, I'd like a more convincing case because I do think I may have picked up on something
Like I said, defending yourself against his accusations is fine but I think you can just correct him and leave it at that. Instead you chose to think he was lying and misrepresenting you and asked for his scum meta. Seems a tad excessive to me and I'm thinking maybe you reacted that way cause you thought you had to.he's voting me though. I feel a defensive stance is fair here, especially when the reasoning for voting me is blantantly untrue
would you feel better about me simply no selling him?
True, especially since Chris played Smarks last game as well so the stuff in the OP isn't news to him at all.This is so true. And literally ANYBODY that's not a complete novice knows there is overlap so it's entirely filler content. If anything I could see scum wanting to be quick to be the ones to point it out. Not worth town points at all
Like I said, defending yourself against his accusations is fine but I think you can just correct him and leave it at that. Instead you chose to think he was lying and misrepresenting you and asked for his scum meta. Seems a tad excessive to me and I'm thinking maybe you reacted that way cause you thought you had to.
Welp, fine I guess, just letting the class know your post pinged meWhen have I ever just left things at that when it comes to me being misinterpretented though? I genuinely think his case is crap and his read back was crap
I'm arguing you said I read Tweet null when that was false. Would you like me to point to the posts where I have done so?
If you had misconstrued the post and didn’t want to admit a mistake, what level of confidence do you have in what you picked up on?
As I said you still merely said you wouldn't give it any thought so hedging your bets at that point. There were other aspects you didn't address at all, in fact I debunked your point on Lethal already
About the same as before which is that it could mean something and I lose nothing for floating the idea