So . . . it's been awhile hasn't it? I don't think anyone remembers this but in my last post I stated an intention to become more active on here. That it was back in 2014. I honestly had no idea why I thought I'd be able to find time during the holiday season but yeesh, did that not go well. For those who don't remember me or those who are new, I'm just a guy who use to be a big wrestling fan that quickly grew disinterested in the product. I also reviewed every PPV from 2013 despite disliking the product pretty heavily (I said at the beginning of the year I was going to do it & back then I kept my word). After I finished up critiquing I pretty much quit WWE, I hadn't seen a single show until WM31, which I intended to review on here but I couldn't find the time (in short, I thought the Seth Rollins stuff was brilliant but I can hardly remember what else happened on the show bar that stupid Sting match).
Luckily, I found the time to review WrestleMania 32 but before I get into that, I feel the need to explain my perspective since it's likely different from most of those who've already posted reviews. As you've probably already gathered, I did not follow the build to this, I have not followed WWE since last years Mania. The most I did was skim over the card on wikipedia. Hell, I found out who was in the ladder match by watching the entrances. If it wasn't a semi-tradition with my friend (who has the Network), I wouldn't have even bothered. So I'm not invested in any of the stories and I'm barely invested in any of the characters. Also, I skipped the pre-show because five hours was too god damn long as it is.
WrestleMania 32 Review
Wait, What the Fuck, Zack Ryder Won!?
If you had asked me who I pegged as the least likely person to win the Intercontinental Championship at Mania was, I would've said Sin Cara in a heartbeat. But Zack Ryder would've been a close second. That said, I'm a fan of the decision even if I hear they've already had him drop it (which makes sense, WWE clearly doesn't hold that much love for Zack Ryder). It was unpredictable & gave him a WrestleMania moment that he could be proud of (I love Eve but even I wouldn't want my biggest Mania moment to be her kicking me in the dick).
Results aside, this was a fine opener. There was plenty to like, I'm glad that everyone got a moment to shine. Everybody provided something to the match & managed to get the spotlight though only few stick out to me (Stardust's ladder, Dolph's super-kick mania & Sami's high-flying spots [he was the MVP of this match, his spots were amazing]). To be honest though, there were too much "wait" moments. The wrestlers didn't physically wait but there were several moments scattered throughout with the wrestlers moving as slowly as possible to set-up the ladder. Ziggler's moment were he climb up using only one-leg was the only time it didn't just feel like they were waiting for someone to stop them, instead feeling like a natural incorporation into the flow of the match. & I understand you can't really do these matches without having these rest moments, part of the reason I'm no longer into wrestling is because my tolerance for these spots has definitely lowered (though I will note, this was not an issue last year).
Match Rating: 6/10
Wait, What the Fuck, Chris Jericho Won!?
Much like the opener, the result of this match baffled me. Unlike the opener though, I don't really get this one. But I also don't get why they apparently had these guys fight like five times during the build to this match & just have a regular match for Mania. Mania's usually fresh matches, the return matches are for Backlash Payback. Anyway, Jericho's surprise Mania win (cause that guy almost never wins here), this was okay. To be honest, I was actually disappointed by it. After skimming the card, this is the only match I was looking forward to, the only one I expected to be good. It was good but a little standard, I guess? It didn't have that Mania feel but it did feel like a match trying to have that Mania feel. I'm probably not making much sense right now but I don't know how else to word it. Also, this will be a common theme in this review but it went on for too long. I think if it was trimmed down by two or three minutes, we would've gotten a much better match.
Match Rating: 6/10
Cole, What Does the Scouter Say About Their Power Level?
Well, it certainly wasn't anywhere near 9,000 because they didn't win (nobody with a special entrance did weirdly) but it's okay because it turns out this match was pretty stake-less. I somehow missed that this wasn't for the titles (admittedly, Free Bird rule or not, WWE probably would've had it be a 2 on 2 or maybe even a 4 on 2 had it been for the titles) so I was a little upset that this match amounted to nothing more than a bragging contest.
But really, it's purpose was just to set-up for that moment with Shawn, Mick & Austin. A moment that I could've done without. I've never been huge on nostalgia moments, since they're inherently devoid of any substance but this one in particular seemed more blatantly indulged in nostalgia as opposed to something more substantial than these usually are. I don't think it's impossible to find a balance between the two (speaking of Dragon Ball, the film Battle of Gods mixed the two elements perfectly [Resurrection of F though was more in line with WWE]) but WWE often opts to go the lazy route. I found little enjoyment out of seeing these legends show up to do nothing more than hit their finishers (& dance I guess) because their popular wrestlers synonymous with WrestleMania.
You may have noticed that despite rambling on for a long time I've yet to say anything about the actual match. There's a simple reason for that, I can't remember the match, like at all. I recall liking it though so I won't be that harsh in the ratings (or I wouldn't be but I'm going to factor in the post-match here, so I've knocked it down one point for that).
Match Rating: 4/10
Funny Thing About Expectations
Reading through this thread has lead me to believe that once again, I hold a dissenting view on at least two of the big matches for Mania. The first of those two matches would be Ambrose & Lesnar. & if I had to theorize to why I felt differently about this match from most everyone else it would be "expectation." As I said earlier, the only match I was looking forward to was AJ & Y2J yet I ended up liking this match more. It probably was even my favorite (though not the best match, that's up next) but going in, I didn't expect to like it, thanks to my less than favorable opinion on Dean Ambrose's wrestling (though, his character & promo work is fantastic). The hype video got me a little excited & the match, at least watching it with family & friends, was fun. It was far from a blood bath & most likely didn't deliver the brutality the build seemed to promise, so I understand the disappointment. But for me, seeing Lesnar dominate someone never gets old & I thought Ambrose was on-point here. He was confined to a few weapons but his personality did get shine through (with the barbed wire make-out & the chainsaw) and I like how he managed to realistically get an advantage over Lesnar using his one weakness (his dick). Plus, I liked the finish of the F-5 on the chairs.
It was a fun match for me, a bit repetitive & it's not going to be a rocket to the moon for Ambrose that many people were probably expecting/hoping for since he lost but I thought it worked well enough. & as I alluded to, watching it with other people & not watching the build likely did improve my opinion on it. & of course, not caring about the product certainly helps me ignore Lesnar winning as any kind of flaw.
Match Rating: 7/10
So These Are The Women I've Heard So Much About
If there's been one downside to my disinterest in wrestling, it's been missing NXT from what I hear. & the biggest downside to that was missing the Women's division in NXT. I can't tell you how much my friend praised Bayley vs. Sasha Banks to me, citing it as one of his all-time favorite matches. As a fan of women's wrestling, this interested me but never enough to actually set time aside to watch it. Despite that, I wasn't excited for this match because I was under the impression that WWE wasn't even going to give this five minutes, par for the course as it was when I watched. But it got more time than all but three matches & to me, that's the biggest distinction between the division now & then.
From what I saw here, I don't hold this women's as better wrestlers than most from the past (Trish Stratus, Lita, Molly Holly, Gail Kim, Beth Phoenix, Natalya [though she's still around, isn't she?], Mickie James, Michelle McCool, Victoria, Eve Torres & Melina off the top of my head) but they've definitely been given more chance to show off their talents instead of their assets. The three women here are clearly talented individuals & put on a great bout but it wasn't without it's flaws. I wasn't thrilled with the finish & there were a few sloppy moments. For example, it's impressive how badly Sasha messed up that sunset flip & Charlotte should probably stop doing the Figure 8 because she fumbled every time she went for the bridge. But it was still an entertaining bout.
As for the Women's Championship, it's a vast improvement over the Diva's Toy Belt. Can't say I'm thrilled with the color palette they went with but the idea of a palette swap WWE Championship is pretty cool, as it reinforces the value of the Championship in relation to the Diva's. This is their WWE Championship. However, I have one big issue with the belt, it doesn't keep the lineage of the original. Why go out of there way to show clips of the original Championship way back to the 80's, if the new belt was just going to disregard all that & contain it's own title history? There's a power in being first surely but the long storied history of a Championship can be a pretty effective tool. Ah well, nothing I can do about it I guess.
Match Rating: 8/10
As God as My Witness, He Is Broken in Half
Throughout the history of WWE, there are several spots & moments that have been forever etched into the minds of any WWE fan. Hogan slamming Andre, A blood-drenched Stone Cold refusing to tap to Bret, Rock & Hogan's face-off at X8, Lita's nipple & perhaps the most beloved off all those, Undertaker throwing Mankind off the Cell. Not only is that spot beloved but that match is highly regarded among most wrestling fans. However, to be honest, I find that match to be one of the worst HIAC's back before WWE turned them into just another gimmick. Granted, it was still light-years ahead of the worst one from that era (Nash vs. Trips) but it does not rank within my top five. & I love that famous spot, & I like the spot through the cell even better. But the match continued for a good while after that, & it wasn't very interesting.
The question with that match & this one here, is how much value do you place on a singular spot? Shane's elbow off the Cell was incredibly, one of the best spots in WWE history, certainly one of the most risky (I can't really think of anything that beats it there but I'm covering my ass in case Lockard or Stopstop are still around to point out a better one) however most of the match was incredibly dull. Shane's offense consisted off nothing more than punches & weak looking submissions for the longest time & Undertaker wasn't much better. It got better once they left the Cell but 30 minutes was too much for a match that doesn't amount to much more than one incredible spot. As for the question I posed to myself, my take has always been this, I'm not going to be revisiting the matches, I'll be revisiting the spot. There's little reason to watch all of Taker/Mankind & absolutely no reason to revisit Shane/Taker in full, if I want to see the spot, I'm just going to watch the clip online. The spot gives value to the matches existence but it does give a reason to watch the match.
Match Rating: 4/10
Filler Royal
I'm going to level with you guys, I was just about done finalizing the show rating when I realized that I had completely forgotten about the Battle Royal. For a match involving Tatanka, DDP & Shaq, it's impressive how forgettable it truly was. The only real positives I have to say about it our the participants, which is a pretty bad sign. Though, I do like that someone new won, though from my understanding, winning this is essentially meaningless but it's still good that at least one newer guy got to go over the more established wrestlers.
Match Rating: 4/10
6 Second Match, 60 Minute Segment
Okay, it didn't last 60 minutes, I think it was close to thirty minutes at least, which was way too long. Rock with the flamethrower was slightly cool I guess but he took forever to use it because, with the exception of wrestling, Rock takes his sweet time with pretty much everything. This segment had the speed of a snail moving at a leisurely pace. I don't really care about the Wyatts coming out to eviscerate The Rock only to get eviscerated themselves (Pro-tip Bray, next time, don't tell the person you're plan & then patiently wait so said person can make fun of you for five minutes straight [also, don't agree to his terms for a fair match]) but I certainly didn't find it very entertaining. I normally don't include segments into the review but considering the inordinate amount of time we spent with this one & how soul-suckingly boring it was, I'm counting it. I really didn't think The Rock would have a segment worse than the one last year with Ronda.
Match Rating:1/10
Dear God End Already or Have Stephanie Take off Her Jacket
Basically, those were the only two thoughts going though my head during the main event of WrestleMania. The former partly because the PPV had been going on for a long time & had stopped being good over an hour ago but the match itself was painfully dull & at 27 minutes, went on way longer than it should've. The only part of the match I really liked that didn't involve Stephanie McMahon, was that neckbreaker spot on Roman. The rest of the match was either flat-out boring or something I've seen plenty of times before. The Spear through the barricade had the same build & emphasis to it as the ones in the video games do. & Reigns constant Superman punches weren't that engaging. I also want to say they repeated a spot immediately at one point but my memory on it is actually kinda fuzzy. I don't share the fervent hatred for Roman that most of the IWC seem to but I share their distaste for the situation WWE created here & their refusal to make accommodations to their plan based on the negative fan reaction. This is a main event that makes it pretty easy to stay away from the product.
& for the latter, my avatar on this site was at one point just a photo of her ass from that time she announced Mr. America on Smackdown. Of course, pervy thoughts were dominating my mind, not like the match itself had anything to offer.
Match Rating:2/10
Show Rating: 4.2/10
Just for reference, out of the 11 PPV's I reviewed in 2013, only two PPV's rated lower than this, Night of Champions (which got a 3.9) & WrestleMania XXIX (which got a 3.8). Pretty bad Mania overall, which is upsetting because I liked quite a bit of it. The first act was good, the second act was great but that third act was an overly long train-wreck. If I was more attached to the product & invested in who won & lost, I probably would've rated the overall show lower but I don't think it would've gotten lower than XXIX, which was abysmal pretty much all around (my highest score from that show was 5). Also, if my show ratings were weighted instead of just the average, both these Mania's would've scored lower, which is upsetting to think about. Anyway, with that all said, I don't imagine I'll remain very active on here post-this post but even if this is my last post until next Mania, at least I made it an uncomfortably long one.