I agree, this is just wrong. I mean, threres still c ahnce they do an underdog type thing after he loses so often and he cashes in MITb and wins that match though.
It may also be jsut me but Im thinking they may use this as a heel turn. Like he could get sick of losing and take it out on Kane, and then also tell off the crowd and make fun of them and calls them so and so for not being straight edge. All this before cashing in MITB.
Bit either way, I dont really trust WWE right now, because they look like they had plans for him but something went wrong, and now theyre just letting him slide.
And one more thing, if he cashes in on the goddamn ECW title, im done.
I cant see Punk being turned heel, and using the fact "you're not all straight edge like me, fuck you" as his reasons. There's two big things wrong with this...
1. why, oh why, would wwe turn someone who is committed to no use of drugs to heel, and then make them hate those who do drink, smoke and use drugs? especially at this point in time, with everything surroounding drug use?
2. its just dumb, lol. you cant use that as an excuse, who's going to buy it? you? yeh, sure.
id like to see him go heel, i think thatd be a great turn of events, and surely it would help him get higher up the card. he could fued with kane, or one of the hardies, and get a little more credibility.
No. What makes it "money in the bank" is the fact that everyone who has held it has gone on to become a champion. It means that, once a year, we see a midcarder come up and really shake up the main event, so every PPV doesn't become "Batista Vs. Undertaker 16, BAH GAWD HE KICKED OUT OF THE BATISTA BOMB THAT'S UNBELIEVABLE BAH GAWD" and "Triple H Vs. Randy Orton 47, BAH GAWD HE KICKED OUT OF THE RKO THAT'S UNBELIEVABLE BAH GAWD." Yeah, they hate each other, we get it, MOVE ON. Make Punk lose the match and that no longer becomes true. It just becomes "in this briefcase is a random championship match."
see how this would be such a great thing to do? it would put punk in the ME scenario, and it would push the shit outta the heel that beats him. imagine the shit edge would get over beating punk when he uses his MiTB contract! And it's not like its the end of the world for Punk, the contract has still done the same thing, it's put him in the ME scene, and quite honestly has given him a little more credibility, since he has to fight twice as hard for it.
on top of this, like i said, it leaves open the doubt in everyone's mind - will they win their title match?
How about this: Edge screws Undertaker out of the championship at One Night Stand, winning it with his zaniest scheme yet after a 20 minute match. Then Punk comes out, cashes in, and wins it quite easily from Edge.
no, lol. i hope this was sarcasm. unless edge is baby face and punk is heel, this will never work. it might sit with the crowd, well, a WWE crowd (not sure about ECW) but it wont give any real credibility to Punk. Id like to see Punk get the title with a straight match, even though the idea of Punk being the "ultimate oppurtunits" against te "ultimate oppurtunist" would be cool.
I dont think they know quite what to do with him yet. Ive never really been big on Punk he has got talent and shit but he just hasn't really caught my attension TBH. Well that was until last night were i thought he rocked in that match he stood out and i enjoyed watching him. I think they should push him and see if he can do anything with it.
As for ppl saying its down to Trips that Punk isn't doing anything or getting pushed how the hell do you work that out ???? Oh yeah thats right trips is to blame for everything that goes wrong in wwe my bad
I felt the exact same way yesterday watching JD. Ive never seen the big deal in Punk, but his match yesterday was really good, and I actually enjoyed his moves etc. however, the guy just seems to have this sense of sloppiness in him; not botchy-sloppy, but just his moves, punches, kickes all seem like he's not fully committed of something, and he's only going 80%. This i see in his kicks and punches more than anything.
