- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,452
- Reaction score
- 92
- Points
- 53
- Location
- Montreal, QC
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
I've been raging about this discussion on Facebook for the past week or so and I wanted to hear what you all think of this story.
For those living under a rock, Paula Deen is a world-renowned chef, famously known for her recipes in southern-USA cooking. Her originality is debatable, but she's sold several million cookbooks, had a show on the Food Network, there were several restaurants in the USA that bared her name, and her products (or rather products branded in her name) were sold in several retail outlets across the world. She's been a serious player in the food industry for the past several years.
That was all up until a couple weeks ago when a former employee of her restaurant chain filed a lawsuit against her for an incident stemming back several years that Deen herself used racial insults and jokes at the workplace. Every single store that carried her products, including Walmart, Target, and JCPenny dropped her products, her book publisher canceled sales of her cookbooks including one that was scheduled for an October release, the restaurant chains dropped her name and are currently undergoing a re-branding, and the Food Network immediately terminated her contract and cancelled her show. She is fucking RUINED.
-------------------
Now, the talk surrounding this issue deals mostly with Deen's supporters submitting that the punishment didn't fit the crime. Deen alleges that she only used "the N word" once her whole damn life, and it was 28 years ago while she was held at gun point during a bank robbery while working as a teller or something rather (she was a bank employee, let's leave it at that)
However, the woman filing the lawsuit insists this was a regular thing from her, so Deen released a deposition pertaining to the matter. In this deposition, Deen not only admitted to having used the word in the past (albeit not in her restaurants), but also went so far as to describe an idea she had for a "plantation-style wedding" for her brother back in the early 2000's in which black waiters would be dressed in black shorts and white long-sleeved shirts. For those who don't understand the significance of this, basically it's the dress code for a house slave of the 1800's. And Deen sincerely believed this was a cute idea and deposing this information only gave her accuser credibility imo.
-------------------
Now I'll be the first to chime in on this since I've been chiming in all fucking week everywhere else.
Firstly, the bank robbery story... Ok, I get that you're mad. Some black guy pointed a gun in your face, threatened your security, you felt violated, you were a little riled up and probably said some things you didn't mean. Fair enough. But don't tell me that was the only time you used that word if it was the first word that came to mind when you weren't thinking clearly. I'm just saying, it sounds to me like she had at least some experience with the context of that word before hand. Her mind was clearly trained to single out the man's ethnicity first, I'm just saying. There's a million words I would use to describe someone who threatened my well-being, and I honestly doubt the man's ethnicity would matter the slightest to me assuming I could have been DEAD.
Secondly, Deen has also asserted that "30 years ago it was a different time". Um... no it wasn't. Maybe if we were talking about 50 years ago, like back in the 1960's, I would probably give her that. But we're talking about something that apparently happened in 1983 or 1984. Segregation and civil rights movements were beyond fucking dead by that point and African American heritage was beginning to go mainstream. I certainly wasn't raised to discriminate against anyone and I was raised in the country where you would probably expect that sort of thing. My very first friend was a black girl for fucks sake, so I'm totally not seeing this "different time" assertion whatsoever.
And lastly, a fucking slave wedding? Are you serious??? You know, I'm just going to go out on a limb here and say that no white person without any inclination towards white supremacy would ever fathom an idea like that. Personally, the idea would never fucking occur to me. And if you just want to have an old school southern-type wedding, just find a cotton field or a barn somewhere out in the middle of nowhere, maybe some cows and horses running around everywhere, and leave it at that. Why do you need slaves to make it seem that much more authentic? Who the hell thinks of something like this? Better yet, who the hell admits to something like that and acts like it's the most beautiful thing ever? Ideal for a WEDDING no less.
Frankly I think it was a good move for all those companies to drop her ass.
Thoughts?
For those living under a rock, Paula Deen is a world-renowned chef, famously known for her recipes in southern-USA cooking. Her originality is debatable, but she's sold several million cookbooks, had a show on the Food Network, there were several restaurants in the USA that bared her name, and her products (or rather products branded in her name) were sold in several retail outlets across the world. She's been a serious player in the food industry for the past several years.
That was all up until a couple weeks ago when a former employee of her restaurant chain filed a lawsuit against her for an incident stemming back several years that Deen herself used racial insults and jokes at the workplace. Every single store that carried her products, including Walmart, Target, and JCPenny dropped her products, her book publisher canceled sales of her cookbooks including one that was scheduled for an October release, the restaurant chains dropped her name and are currently undergoing a re-branding, and the Food Network immediately terminated her contract and cancelled her show. She is fucking RUINED.
-------------------
Now, the talk surrounding this issue deals mostly with Deen's supporters submitting that the punishment didn't fit the crime. Deen alleges that she only used "the N word" once her whole damn life, and it was 28 years ago while she was held at gun point during a bank robbery while working as a teller or something rather (she was a bank employee, let's leave it at that)
However, the woman filing the lawsuit insists this was a regular thing from her, so Deen released a deposition pertaining to the matter. In this deposition, Deen not only admitted to having used the word in the past (albeit not in her restaurants), but also went so far as to describe an idea she had for a "plantation-style wedding" for her brother back in the early 2000's in which black waiters would be dressed in black shorts and white long-sleeved shirts. For those who don't understand the significance of this, basically it's the dress code for a house slave of the 1800's. And Deen sincerely believed this was a cute idea and deposing this information only gave her accuser credibility imo.
-------------------
Now I'll be the first to chime in on this since I've been chiming in all fucking week everywhere else.
Firstly, the bank robbery story... Ok, I get that you're mad. Some black guy pointed a gun in your face, threatened your security, you felt violated, you were a little riled up and probably said some things you didn't mean. Fair enough. But don't tell me that was the only time you used that word if it was the first word that came to mind when you weren't thinking clearly. I'm just saying, it sounds to me like she had at least some experience with the context of that word before hand. Her mind was clearly trained to single out the man's ethnicity first, I'm just saying. There's a million words I would use to describe someone who threatened my well-being, and I honestly doubt the man's ethnicity would matter the slightest to me assuming I could have been DEAD.
Secondly, Deen has also asserted that "30 years ago it was a different time". Um... no it wasn't. Maybe if we were talking about 50 years ago, like back in the 1960's, I would probably give her that. But we're talking about something that apparently happened in 1983 or 1984. Segregation and civil rights movements were beyond fucking dead by that point and African American heritage was beginning to go mainstream. I certainly wasn't raised to discriminate against anyone and I was raised in the country where you would probably expect that sort of thing. My very first friend was a black girl for fucks sake, so I'm totally not seeing this "different time" assertion whatsoever.
And lastly, a fucking slave wedding? Are you serious??? You know, I'm just going to go out on a limb here and say that no white person without any inclination towards white supremacy would ever fathom an idea like that. Personally, the idea would never fucking occur to me. And if you just want to have an old school southern-type wedding, just find a cotton field or a barn somewhere out in the middle of nowhere, maybe some cows and horses running around everywhere, and leave it at that. Why do you need slaves to make it seem that much more authentic? Who the hell thinks of something like this? Better yet, who the hell admits to something like that and acts like it's the most beautiful thing ever? Ideal for a WEDDING no less.
Frankly I think it was a good move for all those companies to drop her ass.
Thoughts?
Last edited: