Opinion: Gunther's opponent is not a SummerSlam worthy world title match

[BillyBob42]

I don't even get what the point is in anymore. Now we're complaining about how he cashed in his briefcase and we shouldn't cut him any slack for wanting to prove he's a legit champion but people keep getting involved?

Yeah, because I think this story is very lackluster.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

Yeah, that's probably one of the most controversial title wins. Lol

Yeah. Lot of folks hated that lol. Tbh to me that’s worse than a money in the bank cash in just because he had no claim to it other than just asking Rey lol

 

[BillyBob42]

Rey never got a rematch, did he?

He had to wait until after Summerslam, which Del Rio was champ by then.

 

[Smart Marx]

I think just a lot of people don’t like the money in the bank itself and to be fair a lot of people are speculating that Triple H probably doesn’t either, which is why he basically threw the briefcase away in one night.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

It’s one of my top 5 favorite matches. I hope Triple H likes it lol

 

[BillyBob42]

I think just a lot of people don’t like the money in the bank itself and to be fair a lot of people are speculating that Triple H probably doesn’t either, which is why he basically threw the briefcase away in one night.

Maybe, but I suspect Tiffy will hold it for a while. My problem with it is most of them just cash in the same way, there's little variation.

 

[Smart Marx]

It’s one of my top 5 favorite matches. I hope Triple H likes it lol

My guess is not and not because I didn’t like the drew Thing because I actually think the booking made sense but if you think about it, he added the king of the ring getting a title shot, stipulation a month before money in the bank and then he had the money in the bank winner lose their briefcase on the same night meaning there’s gonna be a full year without a men’s money in the bank briefcase. Doesn’t sound like it’s something he wants to book around.

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

Yeah I wouldn't be surprised if MITB gets replaced by King of the Ring fully and the MITB becomes a more rare Mania occurence again.

 

[Cwalker]

I don't think people have anything against the match.

I do think they've exhausted every thing they can do with the briefcase though

 

[Hidden Blaze]

My guess is not and not because I didn’t like the drew Thing because I actually think the booking made sense but if you think about it, he added the king of the ring getting a title shot, stipulation a month before money in the bank and then he had the money in the bank winner lose their briefcase on the same night meaning there’s gonna be a full year without a men’s money in the bank briefcase. Doesn’t sound like it’s something he wants to book around.

Maybe idk. I mean they been a couple times this happened before. Kane did it, and Ambrose did it I know. I believe Alexa did also. So Vince did it and kept it around also. But then the King of the Ring thing wasn’t there those times. So who knows. hopefully you’re wrong

 

[Cwalker]

Almost all the women winners have cashed in the same night they won it

 

[Smart Marx]

Maybe idk. I mean they been a couple times this happened before. Kane did it, and Ambrose did it I know. I believe Alexa did also. So Vince did it and kept it around also. But then the King of the Ring thing wasn’t there those times. So who knows. hopefully you’re wrong

I don’t think any of those times are you referring to are when they lost that match though. Plus that wasn’t when they just added a similar stipulation a month prior to a pay-per-view.

That’s the kicker for me is giving the KOTR winner a title shot. Triple H is a long term Booker and he probably feels more comfortable doing that than having a briefcase with less restrictions on the booking.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

Almost all the women winners have cashed in the same night they won it

I guess those all slipped my mind. Only reason I remember the Alexa one is it’s always in my Facebook memories every year where I made the photo of her as champion my Facebook banner lmao

 

[Smart Marx]

Almost all the women winners have cashed in the same night they won it

I imagine for similar reasons, because Vince probably didn’t care to have to think about a woman, holding the briefcase and having to actually plan for it.

Although I think it’s different having them cash in and then win versus having someone cash in the same night and lose, which then means you don’t have a money in the bank briefcase winner, or money in the bank champion for an entire year.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

I don’t think any of those times are you referring to are when they lost that match though. Plus that wasn’t when they just added a similar stipulation a month prior to a pay-per-view.

That’s the kicker for me is giving the KOTR winner a title shot. Triple H is a long term Booker and he probably feels more comfortable doing that than having a briefcase with less restrictions on the booking.

Yes. I mentioned the KOTR thing being added. Doesn’t matter if it’s a win or lost however, because it’s still a year without one, like you mentioned. winning doesn’t change there isn’t a person with the case for a year