NFL Pick 'Em Week 14

[Fuji Vice]

12/6
Broncos @ Raiders

12/9
Rams @ Bills
Cowboys @ Bengals
Chiefs @ Browns
Titans @ Colts
Bears @ Vikings
Eagles @ Buccaneers
Ravens @ Redskins
Falcons @ Panthers
Jets @ Jaguars
Chargers @ Steelers
Dolphins @ 49ers
Cardinals @ Seahawks
Saints @ Giants
Lions @ Packers

12/10
Monday Night Football
Texans @ Patriots​

1. [MENTION=296]Ghostface Killa[/MENTION] 58 - 28 .674
2. [MENTION=121]Porkchop Express[/MENTION] 111 - 64 .634
3. [MENTION=51]Fuji Vice[/MENTION] 90 - 59 .604
4. [MENTION=53]Bad News Booty[/MENTION] 103 - 72 .589
5. [MENTION=78]TactMrBlack[/MENTION] 101 - 77 .567

 

[Petty]

12/6
Broncos

12/9
Bills
Bengals
Chiefs
Colts
Bears
Buccaneers
Ravens
Falcons
Jets
Steelers
49ers
Cardinals
Giants
Packers

12/10
Monday Night Football
Texans

 

[JakeYourBooty]

Broncos
Bills
Bengals
Browns
Colts
Bears
Bucs
Skins
Falcons
Jaguars
Steelers
49ers
Seahawks
Giants
Packers
Texans

 

[TactMrBlack]

Broncos for tonight

 

[Wang Chung]

Broncos

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2


12/9
Rams @ Bills
Cowboys @ Bengals
Chiefs @ Browns
Titans @ Colts
Bears @ Vikings
Eagles @ Buccaneers
Ravens @ Redskins
Falcons @ Panthers
Jets @ Jaguars
Chargers @ Steelers
Dolphins @ 49ers
Cardinals @ Seahawks
Saints @ Giants
Lions @ Packers

12/10
Monday Night Football
Texans @ Patriots

 

[Fuji Vice]

Yeah, I'll take Denver tonight as well.

 

[Petty]

Scores?

 

[Fuji Vice]

Scores?

They're in the first post now.

 

[Petty]

I see. I find it funny I have the best average almost every week. You guys are slipping lol

 

[Fuji Vice]

I see. I find it funny I have the best average almost every week. You guys are slipping lol

Interestingly enough, you probably should have kept your mouth shut dude. You see, I thought there was a bit of a discrepancy with your numbers and lo and behold it seems you haven't participated in the same amount of weeks as everyone else. Therefore, doesn't it seem that averages shouldn't be the way to decide things (being as its easier to have a higher average with less overall picks)? Well if you'd like an answer to that I can say that its an emphatic yes and so in the interest of making things as fair as possible why don't we use this system instead?

1. Porkchop Express +47
2. Bad News Booty +31
3. Fuji Vice +31
4. Ghostface Killa +30
5. TactMrBlack +24

Those statistics are based on wins over losses and show a definitive winner based on the amount of games that each individual person has picked. I certainly think they're a lot more telling than a weighted average that's skewed due to participating in the contest for a lesser amount of time.

 

[TactMrBlack]

Interestingly enough, you probably should have kept your mouth shut dude. You see, I thought there was a bit of a discrepancy with your numbers and lo and behold it seems you haven't participated in the same amount of weeks as everyone else. Therefore, doesn't it seem that averages shouldn't be the way to decide things (being as its easier to have a higher average with less overall picks)? Well if you'd like an answer to that I can say that its an emphatic yes and so in the interest of making things as fair as possible why don't we use this system instead?

1. Porkchop Express +47
2. Bad News Booty +31
3. Fuji Vice +31
4. Ghostface Killa +30
5. TactMrBlack +24

Those statistics are based on wins over losses and show a definitive winner based on the amount of games that each individual person has picked. I certainly think they're a lot more telling than a weighted average that's skewed due to participating in the contest for a lesser amount of time.

Even though I'm last in each I like this way better


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Petty]

Interestingly enough, you probably should have kept your mouth shut dude. You see, I thought there was a bit of a discrepancy with your numbers and lo and behold it seems you haven't participated in the same amount of weeks as everyone else. Therefore, doesn't it seem that averages shouldn't be the way to decide things (being as its easier to have a higher average with less overall picks)? Well if you'd like an answer to that I can say that its an emphatic yes and so in the interest of making things as fair as possible why don't we use this system instead?

1. Porkchop Express +47
2. Bad News Booty +31
3. Fuji Vice +31
4. Ghostface Killa +30
5. TactMrBlack +24

Those statistics are based on wins over losses and show a definitive winner based on the amount of games that each individual person has picked. I certainly think they're a lot more telling than a weighted average that's skewed due to participating in the contest for a lesser amount of time.

Even though I'm last in each I like this way better


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is no mistake. I'm late but even so by my average and right to wrong ratio I'd be in the top two had i been in from the start. Next year I'll be in from the start. More so I know there is no way I'm winning this year but I'll be happy knowing where I placed you know?

 

[Fuji Vice]

There is no mistake. I'm late but even so by my average and right to wrong ratio I'd be in the top two had i been in from the start. Next year I'll be in from the start. More so I know there is no way I'm winning this year but I'll be happy knowing where I placed you know?

Well that's speculating that you would have averaged the same correct answers each week that you weren't in it. I guess if you want I can come up with a more complex system to weight everything as evenly as possible, but I like this one better since it seems a tad fairer. Even if its not the most precise, it also doesn't punish you for not being in as long as some others (since if that were the case you'd be in last). Does that make sense?

 

[JakeYourBooty]

Booty approves

 

[Petty]

I'm not complaining at all. I'll go along with whatever works for the game Fuji.