I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I understand that i misinterpreted a warning for being severe and I already made that point.. I wouldnt be continuing if I hadnt been called dumb numerous times
How about not being warned because I was responding to something someone said and it was considered "spam" and I got warned for it?
If someone makes a statement that is off the topic of the thread then they should be warned or the post should be removed. That way I cant sit there and respond to it and get a needless warning for mentioning/defending something.
I believe that it isnt right at all to be warned for saying something back about it... Someone mentioned how bad Twilight the book series was and whatrever... So i defend that by saying I loved the book series and the movie was ok... I come on here and have a warning saying that post is spam and contributed nothing... If I want to talk about that horrid book then go to the peeps section..
Apparently then there shouldnt be ANY mention to the book..
Im not dumb so dont try to act as if I am I am making a simple point that if someone makes a reference to it and I make a post about that reference.. Then how is that spam but his comment isnt?