Live WrestleMania 37 Discussion Thread - Night Two - April 11th

[THISisAWESOME]

No clue why people are mad. Roman is the hottest thing in wrestling right now. I think it’s funny that you guys think Edge or Bryan even need that rub. You build a new face to beat Roman. Should be Keith Lee or something. Big E if he gets momentum is an option tool. I’m happy they’re keeping the title on someone who actually plays and looks the part of champion. Lashley and Roman. Vince is going back to the basics and I love it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed, broski. It's time to stop relying on B+ players and build an A+ to take on the Head of the Table. Washed up cripples can't cut the mustard against Alpha Reigns.

 

[Hoss]

So you've been both refuted and dismissed.

 

[Hoss]

Sorry I don't know what came over me

 

[Roy Mustang]

Not really because the scenario I laid out, a legend would be beating the top guy and then dropping it to an up-and-comer.

But they didn't did they? So again your scenario is unlikely to play out because WWE don't do that shit

 

[Mox Girl]

im still mad about the rock thing

me too lol

 

[Poyser]

Agreed, broski. It's time to stop relying on B+ players and build an A+ to take on the Head of the Table. Washed up cripples can't cut the mustard against Alpha Reigns.

why is this gimmick from legit 2014 still going

 

[Mox Girl]

What a great night it was to see the Head of the Table crush the hopes and dreams of geeks everywhere. Sorry guys but alphas always win in the end.

please shut up lol. guys remember that most roman fans dont act like this

 

[Smart Marx]

Cool he can do that WITHOUT THE TITLE

Roman can also do something without the belt. This generation versus that generation means nothing to me. I only see two wrestlers (three counting DB) who killed that main event. No reason Roman can be champ and Edge can't, but again DB also winning would have been great. Just don't see why spent 8 months on this run not to put someone over at Mania. He said cut his reign short, it's been 8 months. But, like I said, we're not going to agree on this.

 

[Sabretooth]

Gambitto, I don’t think you can only factor age into it.

If someone can wrestle on the same level as the young guys then that’s enough. Just because he’s older doesn’t mean he doesn’t deserve a title. It doesn’t make a “current guy” look weak if they lose to someone who can work the same rate as them even if he’s older.

 

[Poyser]

Roman didn’t wrestle for 4 months because he’s scared of covid that doesn’t sound very alpha

 

[Roy Mustang]

Roman can also do something without the belt. This generation versus that generation means nothing to me. I only see two wrestlers (three counting DB) who killed that main event. No reason Roman can be champ and Edge can't, but again DB also winning would have been great. Just don't see why spent 8 months on this run not to put someone over at Mania. He said cut his reign short, it's been 8 months. But, like I said, we're not going to agree on this.

Why does a title reign need to end at Mania? If every reign ends at Mania it's too predictable. The story made sense to not end it at Mania. Edge needs the belt far less then Roman. Roman it helps with his head of the table character

 

[Mox Girl]

both womens titles changed hands, but neither men's title did

 

[Mox Girl]

cool little fact

 

[THISisAWESOME]

Reigns is the best heel this company has seen since the HHH/JBL days. No other heel can get booed these days by hipster fans except a true alpha who they envy like the Head of the Table. Reigns is pulling so many women and these geeks can't stand it.

 

[Poyser]

Should have put them both on Nia