That whole "not a WWE guy" stigma is silly......no the people in charge didn't like using guys who didn't work their style and had bad in ring habits they don't like.
Use common sense, "we only hired so and so and don't want them getting over".......like wtf?!?!?!
Rasslin fans make themselves look so goofy sometimes.
"what about Ryder?" He sucked ass and Zack Ryder was a silly comedic character and good luck making that a top guy who should beat Undertaker or whatever, he isn't as derpy now on the indie scene and look what happened.
When I say not a WWE guy I dont mean WWE style or WWE original I mean a hand picked WWE guy. Rollins is a WWE guy for example because he was hand picked to be successful. LA Knight isn't because he was meant to be a go nowhere time filler feud for Bray but got over and lets be honest here despite being the most over guy in WWE right now they've done nothing with him. Squashing irrelevant jobbers like Hit Row and Miz doesn't mean anything.
WWE has a long history of refusing to get behind the vast majority of people who have gotten organically over in the last 2 decades in favour of just pushing the status quo.
And its not just Ryder. But Rusev, Sandow, Barrett, Ziggler just to name a few. They dragged their feet in getting behind Bryan and Becky. Sami Zayns overness went nowhere.
I dont get how people can watch WWE, see the likes of Reigns, Rollins, Charlotte, McIntyre, etc who are clearly picked for success from day one and pushed accordingly and pretend that WWE doesn't play favourites. Even now we've got the likes of Austin Theory who are featured prominently and pushed hard despite struggling to garner any kind of reaction from the audience while with LA Knight we constantly have HHH saying "Knights time will come" as he loses every big opportunity