This angry little douchebag is a complete and utter joke. He speaks as if he's been through the Attitude era, and I took one look at this video and immediately realized he's not even old enough to have "been through that".
1) Jobbers were not abolished in the Attitude era. Maybe if the moron had actually watched it, he would know that WWE was pretty much washed with them up until the WCW guys came over and there wasn't any room for many jobbers on the roster anymore. They had an entire division for jobbers, it was called the "Hardcore division".
2) Bitching about good matches on free tv? Seriously? I bet the smurf watches streams anyways. As if I'm to believe this snot-nosed punk is forking over $60 every month out of his own pocket and has any reason to bitch about such a thing? The good tv matches are rarely, I mean RARELY, even between two wrestlers with a match scheduled at an up-coming ppv. When it does happen, it's usually a rematch from a match that already happened at the most recent ppv. Not sure what he's on about.
3) 12 ppv's a year was WCW's doing, not WWE's. Oh, and they are pretty friggin important to WWE making MONEY and being able to afford everything else they do. I fucking hate it when children speak of things they don't understand. Again, seriously doubt the kid is buying the ppv's anyways.
4) The # of rematches really isn't an issue. It's been the same way for decades, not even sure what he's talking about. Hogan and Andre feuded for several years and had waaaaay more than 3 matches. Austin and Rock had 3 matches at Wrestlemania alone. So his claim about "the best rivalries only have a few matches" is completely false.
5) He's right about too many belts. But that doesn't exactly take an expert to see.
6) Noticed the guy has a video called "Cena sells stuff, who cares?" I'm guessing the people who sell it and the people who buy the shit. What a tool.
7) Wrestlers are not limited to one show anymore. The video's a little old, so whatever. But I don't get how that means "only a fraction of the audience sees certain stars". Is he aware those shows are televised in the same countries? He makes it seems like only America gets Raw and only England gets Smackdown. If that were the case, this claim would make sense.
8) "No WCW" is a reason wrestling sucks now? Boy, we have a real genius talking here. Can't even believe it fell this low on his list. If I did a video like this, this would be the only thing I would talk about. This is THE only reason. The Attitude era was an evolution of the product. After it was over, it slowly reverted back to how it had been traditionally before the Monday Night War. It tried to recapture the glory days of the 80's when WWE was more cartoony, geared primarily towards children, and unopposed by competition. But they simply forgot this isn't the 80's anymore and both WWE, WCW, ECW, and the INTERNET had changed the culture and expectations of the audience. No mention of any of this in his video.
9) Can't believe he even mentioned Alundra Blayze or women's wrestling in general having anything to do with it. Wow. It was actually at it's strongest peak after the Attitude Era.
10) Attitude era was a WWE thing. Not the same as the "Monday Night Wars". He says that when he speaks of the "Attitude Era", he means "WWE, WCW, and ECW". Well... he's an idiot then.
11) Mad at Miz for claiming to be "filling the shoes" of Rock and Austin? Not even sure what the fuck he's talking about. I guess he forgot which side of the kayfabe fence he was on.
This is why I don't watch videos like this often, because they seriously give me a headache. So many terrible uninformed opinions crammed into only 10 minutes.
