Yeah ms thanks for reading what you wanna read then say i'm wrong cause you quote one line. OK MS sure
How the fuck is this dropping the Kofi/Orton? No, I wouldn't care because they aren't DROPPING SHIT (and then I wouldn't care anyways as long as Cena doesn't have the belt). This just proves how much of a mastermind Orton is, if he ran in and cost Cena the title to allow Kofi to win. They're all STILL feuding, how aren't you getting this? Didn't you just admit it was you who wasn't using logic all along over this?
I guess you didn't read this either:
Yeah, I'll agree here on Show, but the original point I was arguing was there wasn't any other 'transitional champs.' Show is also not much older than Sheamus, fyi. Also, this still keeps the list at Kofi, Legacy, and Miz from RAW. The WWE coulda bullshitted some reason to jump someone over from ECW or SD as well.
Yeah ms thanks for reading what you wanna read then say i'm wrong cause you quote one line. OK MS sure
How will this make him look awful at the end of the day? You think he looks better now? He hardly gets a reaction now and no one gives a shit because no one gave a shit about that feud after the beginning. If his character kept adapting and he developed more of a bad ass character in that role, who's to say he wouldn't be cheered more than Cena? When's the last time they even had Cena main event against another up and coming face??? Lashley? So how the fuck could you say he would come out looking bad? I'm sure Kofi would get more of a reaction either way than Sheamus and he's certainly built up more. Again, I like Sheamus, but Kofi could certainly have worked just as good/if not better. Because right now I kinda see him being lowered back down to midcard, just a guess though.Sigh.
Okay so Kofi ends up facing Cena. One of the most popular wrestlers on the whole roster. So what happens? The vocal minority that hates Cena cheers for Kofi, but the majority that cheer for him will still cheer for him over Kofi. This will make Kofi look awful at the end of the day.
The 'original feud' ended in one random singles match. It's not like it had to go through a big gimmick of 3 PPVs to culminate this shitty feud. It's not out of the probability or out of the extraordinary to create a situation where Orton/Kofi can still be at each other throats, have their match to culminate their feud (after Kofi wins the battle royale probably), Kofi wins the title (Orton runs in with the shocker because the WWE would expect us all to believe Orton would NEVER help Kofi now after what he's done), and they go from there. In this blunt situation I just made up, their feud culminates in the same way it just did, in a random singles match, so I don't see the big deal.But they're still dropping the Orton/Kofi feud because then Cena is interjected into it. Since the original feud is not played out there is no need to add another dimension to the angle. Especially a ridiculously played out dimension like Orton/Cena. Because it is fairly obvious that in this case it doesn't become about Kofi it becomes about Orton screwing Cena and Cena wanting his revenge and his title back. Very little of the actual angle has to do with Kofi. He's just the guy acting as place holder so yes, in effect the story line is dropped because it's not about Orton/Kofi anymore and the Orton/Kofi angle was never actually finished.
Why wouldn't a casual fan take the US champion seriously? Isn't that enough credibility for some random watching alone? Yeah he beat him before, but all that needs to be worked in as he's a changed man, he's accomplished a pinacle in this business and has defeated everyone that has crossed his path. I don't see the huge stretch in Sheamus randomly dominating Cena after beating some jobbers, than Miz dominating him (probably more heelishly though with something like a chair, such as Batista did with Taker) after overcoming the midcard scene.I did read the bit on Miz yes. I also agree that he is the most over heel on Raw. However if you want him to be taken credibly against Cena by the average fan (and let's face it, that is their target audience, not us) he needs to be built back up against another top guy that is not John Cena first. The average person sitting watching Raw will not buy Miz as a legit threat against Cena without some sort of reasonable prior build up.
I was just kinda throwing that out there as a random fact, sorry. I personally don't think at all that Sheamus' reign will be transitional, but if they were trying to get the title back on Orton or some shit (which I hope they aren't) then Show coulda worked. Either way, I wouldn't want to see the title on either of those two and I think Sheamus is fine.Big Show's age is irrelevant. How long he has been around for is the relevant factor. And again, you still assume that this is a transitional reign. And the bullshitted reason for transferring someone is one of the IWC's most complained about pet peeves so why is it okay here?
ms your being ignorant, grow up. your hilarious to disregard the emphasis on this sloppy booking. they needed a transitional champ so they brought up a no character no name who after this short reign will use this accolade to rule the midcard and to make unover faces look good. yay
. in my past posts ive said hes being booked the same as previous failures who couldnt grasp the spotlight when faced w/ Similiar booking annnnd where are they now.
refer to past posts for the rest of my opinion
again what is it about this guy that deserves to be put on the same pedestal as the rest of the real standouts?
How will this make him look awful at the end of the day?
You think he looks better now? He hardly gets a reaction now
and no one gives a shit because no one gave a shit about that feud after the beginning.
If his character kept adapting and he developed more of a bad ass character in that role, who's to say he wouldn't be cheered more than Cena?
When's the last time they even had Cena main event against another up and coming face??? Lashley? So how the fuck could you say he would come out looking bad?
I'm sure Kofi would get more of a reaction either way than Sheamus and he's certainly built up more.
Again, I like Sheamus, but Kofi could certainly have worked just as good/if not better. Because right now I kinda see him being lowered back down to midcard, just a guess though.
The 'original feud' ended in one random singles match. It's not like it had to go through a big gimmick of 3 PPVs to culminate this shitty feud.
It's not out of the probability or out of the extraordinary to create a situation where Orton/Kofi can still be at each other throats, have their match to culminate their feud (after Kofi wins the battle royale probably), Kofi wins the title (Orton runs in with the shocker because the WWE would expect us all to believe Orton would NEVER help Kofi now after what he's done), and they go from there. In this blunt situation I just made up, their feud culminates in the same way it just did, in a random singles match, so I don't see the big deal.
Why wouldn't a casual fan take the US champion seriously? Isn't that enough credibility for some random watching alone? Yeah he beat him before, but all that needs to be worked in as he's a changed man, he's accomplished a pinacle in this business and has defeated everyone that has crossed his path.
I don't see the huge stretch in Sheamus randomly dominating Cena after beating some jobbers, than Miz dominating him (probably more heelishly though with something like a chair, such as Batista did with Taker) after overcoming the midcard scene.