We all know about the Bryan Danielson and Miz fued, starting on NXT season one, and Micahel Cole has played a majored part in this fued. For months Michael Cole has been running down Daniel Bryan, for his lack of charisma, and being a big fish in a small pond in the indy's. Where as the MIZ is the greatest wrestler.
My question is Danielson worthy of the US title, or did he get the belt, based on his accomplishments prior to the WWE? Is Michael Cole right saying Bryan doesn't have "it" and won't be a sucess in the WWE?
http://[yt]-WDcDI520Zk[/yt]
I love Danielson, however i somewhat feel they handed him the US Title. He's always been known for earning everything, and living up to his name as the best wrestler in the world. HOWEVER in the world of entertainment, i don't know is Danielson will have what it takes.
What are your thoughts on this ?
And a Subtopic - Was Michael Cole right about the NXT season 3 Divas verison. Cause i think he hit the nail on the head with that one.
My question is Danielson worthy of the US title, or did he get the belt, based on his accomplishments prior to the WWE? Is Michael Cole right saying Bryan doesn't have "it" and won't be a sucess in the WWE?
http://[yt]-WDcDI520Zk[/yt]
I love Danielson, however i somewhat feel they handed him the US Title. He's always been known for earning everything, and living up to his name as the best wrestler in the world. HOWEVER in the world of entertainment, i don't know is Danielson will have what it takes.
What are your thoughts on this ?
And a Subtopic - Was Michael Cole right about the NXT season 3 Divas verison. Cause i think he hit the nail on the head with that one.