Anyone who thinks Austin is bad...really doesn't know their shit. That's honest truth.
Gagne and Thesz are remarkably different talents from remarkably different eras. You could only compare them to people of their eras. You go past the 50s and they get smoked by the Gorgeous George's and Buddy Rogers of their days. Both Rogers and George outdrew both of them, know why? Because of character. Know why Bock is so highly regarded? Because of his character was on par with his wrestling ability. Harley Race? Charismatic as hell. The Briscoes and Funks? Charisma. Gagne? Not as good as people want to think he is, nor as important, only so successful because he was the boss.
As far as Austin goes...the biggest draw in the history of the industry is far from a joke. People who think a Thesz could draw money in today's world are full of it, or don't know their shit, or are 50+ years of age and have actually been in the business.
Why do idiots like you talk about Thesz drawing today but refuse to be smart enough to admit two very important things. 1. Austin would have been killed, litereally, in Thesz' time if he acted like he did in thesz's time, and 2. Thesz was so good he didnt have to do what Austin did to draw, he drew crowds as big as Austin did, for 5 times as long a time, and did it on in ring talent. Again, fans today are just not educated enough to understand anyone who tries to compare money earned to day with money earned 50 years ago is about the stupidest thing you can do. I mean, a pro wrestler in the turn of the century was rich if he made 100K a year, which a few did do, yet today, a man with a good education makes that much money and is only middle middle class. You CANT compare them, PERIOD. So to discount the ALL TIME list of wrestlers yet ignoring anything more than 35 years ago is also stupid. And in your words, only a mark under the age of 40 who has no REAL udnerstanding of this sport would do that.... like you just did!