I really want to know. Just let me know what Bryan did to deserve this years Rumble win than Reigns?
I'm not really sure what anyone could "do" to deserve to win the Rumble. They would only be subjective measurements. I can't really see what Reigns did to deserve it either.
While not deserving it more or less than anyone, it's clearly what a large amount of fans want to see.
My disappointment was like some others. I didn't think Bryan was going to win, but I didn't think he'd be jobbed like he was either. I think if he had made it to the final four that it would have been fine. But the way it hhappened, anyone could assume it was a deliberate attempt to push him to the side. It's one thing not to cater completely to the fans, they shouldn't do that. It's a complete different thing to give the fans a middle finger like they did.
I don't think deserving is the criteria that should be used in determining a winner. I don't think Reigns is any more deserving than Bryan is, likewise Bryan is not more deserving than Reigns. It's simply preference and the majority preference right niw seems to lie with Bryan. But giving most of your fans a product they will enjoy is a criteria.