Nah, I saw that Paranormal Activity film, so no...ghosts don't exist.
I mean, if like....nah, just no.
If a random dude dying in some other dude's basement can somehow make an entire house haunted, then why isn't the whole 9/11 area haunted by ghosts or pearl harbor or a battlefield from like world war 1?
Why is it that only creepy castles are supposedly haunted, yet a place like Porn-O land ain't haunted....strippers die too ya' know!
I respect the logic you used, because it's the same logic I subscribed when I used to not believe in them. As I'd said before.. I do believe in them, now - not out of fancy, but because of something I experienced personally many years ago, that left me baffled and the easiest explanation for that (that I can find).. is that ghost really exist.
Still, like I said.. I used to share your logic. But if there's something I definitely learn is that logical explanation is at constant battle with what people feel instinctively when dealing with things of belief. Many people felt a significant amount of fear, or awe instinctively.. toward the idea of spirits rising from the dead. In fact, many fear ghost more than death. Since they can't rid themselves such powerful fear, no matter how unreasonable that fear was, they then believe it must be undoubtedly real. People have been scared of ghosts long before before the concept of paranoia was introduced.
That's why I think the logic you stated as base for you to not believe in ghost, is by far the more intelligent and sensible, than the logic that was used by so many people as the reason why they believe in ghost.
I still believe in ghost though.. because I don't think belief should determine the truth. In the case of ghost, whichever conclusion the truth may side with.. is perfectly sensible to me.
You're saying that it's nonsense.. because not all place where a violent death is haunted. In fact the places that notoriously reputed as being haunted, doesn't have the tragedy or the violence that resulted in death as bad as many places that has never been repoted to be haunted.
I disagree.
I don't think, just 'cos every place that people claimed as haunted.. have a history of horrible deaths.. then, unless every place with similar or even worse tragedies are haunted... it's sensible to assume that they're phony.
It means that you claim to know the standard requirement for the existence... of ghosts and their appearances, when you don't believe them to be real. How?