General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Hoss]

Perhaps both, but especially that he puts on great matches

 

[Deezy]

And this is why the big leagues don't use outdated insider terms.....

 

[Smart Marx]

I disagree with Deezy on many things, but wrestling has meant to tell a story. A guy doing 5 triple moonsaults and a cool set of moves means nothing if the crowd doesn't care about the story being told. If there even is one to begin with.

 

[Hoss]

And this is why the big leagues don't use outdated insider terms.....

that's fine with me I guess?

 

[Smart Marx]

That's why I'm not as hard on some of the weaker move guys because if the story is good I'm happy.

 

[Deezy]

Rasslers never said someone was a good worker before the bull sheets started using them wrong

 

[Hoss]

I disagree with Deezy on many things, but wrestling has meant to tell a story. A guy doing 5 triple moonsaults and a cool set of moves means nothing if the crowd doesn't care about the story being told. If there even is one to begin with.

I would also agree to that. I don't feel like that's what I'm trying to say at all.

 

[Deezy]

They'd describe someone as light/stiff or the shits.

 

[Deezy]

That's why it's inside terms....we as viewers wouldn't know how someone is in the ring.....that honestly should just be what people who wrestle can only assess

 

[Smart Marx]

Like, people shit on Nash all the time, I can't of too many times I didn't walk away happy seeing Nash perform.

 

[Hoss]

Honestly what it all boils down to is that I think there should be a word or phrase that describes guys who are great at the "finer points" of wrestling if you will.

 

[Deezy]

We can be like "this guy sucks" or "I like this guy"....you know.....like an audience actually is for everything else

 

[Smart Marx]

That's why it's inside terms....we as viewers wouldn't know how someone is in the ring.....that honestly should just be what people who wrestle can only assess

I'm mostly agreeing with you, but your contrarian nature is still funny to me. You got mad when I wasn't actually saying that only wrestlers can have opinions, but here you are actually saying that.

 

[Smart Marx]

Honestly what it all boils down to is that I think there should be a word or phrase that describes guys who are great at the "finer points" of wrestling if you will.

Worker probably is that word, but I'll still say a guy like Kevin Nash who can gets crowds invested more than a guy like Dean Malenko is a better worker at the end of the day.

 

[Hoss]

I feel like I'm not going to gain any clarity though so Imma just say fuck what Deezy talking about