General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Chris]

I just personally don't care if a concept is "stolen" if it results in something more entertaining for me, sure people would shit on it but they'll find ways to shit on anything if they want to so I'm putting my entertainment over other people's opinions

 

[Smart Marx]

I was never one to shit too hard on TNA's unique matches, because at least they had some. I'm a sucker for brands actually trying to be different. That's why I loved the 2002-2005 split and hate this current one. If both brands gonna be exactly the same, don't bother me with this shit.

 

[Hoss]

The Gauntlet for the Gold was pretty decent

 

[Chris]

I like Deezy's rule of it takes more than a minute to explain the match then the gimmick shouldn't be done lol

 

[Smart Marx]

WWE still makes Royal Rumbles every year so I don't think you really needed a WCW one. I'm willing to bet you'd probably still hat on theirs because they booked it wrong, anyway.

 

[Hoss]

Not a fan of the King of the Mountain match though lol

 

[Smart Marx]

Deezy is simple. People should have more credit then that.

 

[Chris]

Most of TNA's unique matches were better than WCW's though for sure and I didn't have a problem with most of them, and even if I didn't like the gimmick the matches were usually still good

 

[Smart Marx]

KOTM is my favorite TNA match so suck it, EC.

 

[Hoss]

I

 

[Hoss]

decline

 

[Chris]

Yeah like KOTM was what I was thinking of where I didn't really like the concept, but all the matches were fire so I can forgive that pretty easily

 

[Hoss]

I also hate any kind of reverse battle royal

 

[Chris]

WCW would have had to have really fucked up their Rumbles to make me like them more than the '98 and '99 WWE ones tbh

 

[Chris]

Reverse battle royal might be one of the worst concepts ever ngl, but I did like the part where once it got down to 2 people in the ring it became a regular match and not a battle royal