- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 6,691
- Reaction score
- 1,927
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 37
- Location
- Union City, Tennessee
Imagine if RKO had turned heel, cashed in (sometime after SummerSlam), and lost. How long would it be palatable for the Authority to be trying to force him into a losing situation and how long until HHH booted Orton out of his position and replaced him with somebody else? Would it have been an interesting feud in that situation?
I don't have answers to those questions, so this doesn't fit my usual Socratic questioning method. I'm asking just to ask.
wk
To be honest, not really IMO. It's why I felt Orton pretty much had to win the vacant championship by the end of this Bryan feud because otherwise, his heel turn would have been almost pointless. Why turn heel in a big way only to lose right off the bat? If Orton had failed a cash in at all, then I would have preferred he stayed face while doing it (which means no Authority storyline.)