seabs said:
AE didn't insult our intelligence? A man running round with a sock on his hand was a world champion, sure Folely was a great talent but lets not try to rewrite history. Isn't that what caused a huge issue with the product if you get shocks every week? They become the norm so it isn't a shock. The AE is the reason we think this era is boring, not because it was great but because they over did the high spots causing classic story telling to be lost. We have no patience any more as a collective of fans so the WWE doesn't go with the slow approach any more. #ExpectingToBeFlamed
Nope, shock doesnt get normal even if overly used. Explain why the shock value didnt get boring in the AE Era then?
And as for the AE making the PG era look bad, completely false again, PG era is making PG era look bad. After Attitude Era we still had the Ruthless Agression Era, nobody insulted that Era like they insult PG Era, even though it was below AE standards. Its just that WWE has sunk to a new low because of the PG Era. Targetting 6 - 15 year old kids as audience, what do u expect other than crappy shows?
__________
Draine said:
Rumor has it (famous last words) that they are doing a losing streak angle, which will abruptly end, impressing the ladies, therefore changing his character into an arrogant ladies' man. :facepalm:
WHY KHALI? :angry:
Once again another awful thing about the PG Era. Most of the big name heels are arrogant show offs. Miz, Morrison (when he was a heel), Ziggler, Mcyntre (would be), Cody Rhodes.
Atleast Cody Rhode is trying to be a bit different that always being the arogant show off that wwe made him out to be at first.
__________
seabs said:
Vader was billed at 450lbs.
Forgot about him, but Big Show had a better and much more sucessful career than him. Only exception can be Nash, but then again Nash doesnt fit the Fat Guy type of wrestler im talking about.
__________
seabs said:
Rating are down but they had one of their most successful financial years (2010) under the PG banner. See I can twist facts too.
And ur point is? You are getting part of that money or what? What we the fans care about is how good the show actually is, not how much money they are earning.
Ofcourse they are earning more, thats why they went PG in the first place, it would dumb their show down, but increase their income.
If they cared about making their show better instead of adding more money to their pockets they wouldnt have went PG in the first place.
Nobody is twisting facts.
__________
Crayo said:
JeebaK making me laugh again.
The ratings are down due to how bad the actual product is. They could put on a great show without blood and swearing in PG. I agree more edgyness is needed, but that can all happen under the PG era.
Henry > Big Show.
If they can, they why arent they? Is ur point that vince suddenly became a moron after the PG Era and started doing bad bookings?
You can laugh as much as u want. And trust me it wouldnt be hard for me to write down "Santino > Undertaker" at the end of post, not too hard to type, but the thing you are missing is relevant proof to support your claims. I havent seen any actual proof from you other than "blah blah pg is good, blah blah pg can deliver blah blah vince is doing abd bookins blah blah i like miz i never watched AE Era live so what i watch live is the best blah blah". Thats all there is to your comments.
While i pointed out that ratings dropped since the beginning of the PG Era your reply was "ratings down due to how bad the actual product is", so suddenly the product turned awful since the introduction of PG but PG has nothing to do with it. Sounds totally legit.
And as for Henry > Big Show. What Big Show has achieved in his career, it would take Henry atleast 10 careers to get anywhere near him. Not to mention Big Show is a brand name known almost all around the world, unlike Henry.
