- Joined
- Sep 29, 2012
- Messages
- 27,213
- Reaction score
- 5,799
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 36
- Location
- Toledo, Ohio
- Website
- twitter.com
Which is the execution of prisoners. Do you think it can justify crimes committed? I'm interested to see what others feel about this.
If someone has life or multiple life sentences and have committed horrible crimes then yes. Why should they be a drain on resources that could be used on rehabilitating someone who needs it.
The morality of it just doesn't sit well with me. I'm debating whether or not it's okay to go an eye for an eye.
I think you throw away your right to be treated like a person when you behave like an animal. At that point morals don't apply to you. Of course I'm speaking of the most heinous of crimes, such as murder, rape, or any type of mistreatment of children.The morality of it just doesn't sit well with me. I'm debating whether or not it's okay to go an eye for an eye.
I think you throw away your right to be treated like a person when you behave like an animal. At that point morals don't apply to you. Of course I'm speaking of the most heinous of crimes, such as murder, rape, or any type of mistreatment of children.
I don't understand the satisfaction a person could get by simply killing someone.
I'm on the fence with capitol punishment. If we're talking about (mass-) murder, on the one hand, taking their life seems too quick and easy compared to the life of torment they've set out for the family of the victims. But on the other hand, taking their life ensures they'll never be able to commit the crimes again. If the prison they're kept in were to have a huge disaster and most of the high-profile prisoners escaped, then that's more people at risk.
Sure, you could argue that spending time in isolation could sometimes cure an ill mind, but it's more often the psychotic stay psychotic, and if given a second chance would do the only thing they could: kill, rape or maim. Repeat the process.
I'm on the fence with capitol punishment. If we're talking about (mass-) murder, on the one hand, taking their life seems too quick and easy compared to the life of torment they've set out for the family of the victims. But on the other hand, taking their life ensures they'll never be able to commit the crimes again. If the prison they're kept in were to have a huge disaster and most of the high-profile prisoners escaped, then that's more people at risk.
Sure, you could argue that spending time in isolation could sometimes cure an ill mind, but it's more often the psychotic stay psychotic, and if given a second chance would do the only thing they could: kill, rape or maim. Repeat the process.
I definitely do believe in it. If they have committed crimes like murder, then yes. I still think keeping them in 2x4 cells and giving them the minimum amount of food and water to survive and periodically torture them is better though.....If their crimes are bad enough.
I have a feeling you were in the Bush administration....