Right two things before I get into this. Firstly, I've been meaning to put this up since the end of the last PPV so come the conclusion of the main event HIAC, this topic could become pretty irrelevant so take it for it's worth. Secondly, no shit about ratings/draws and all that crap. You've been warned.
So let me start by saying that up until now i've really been enjoying this feud and think all 4 guys & Steph have played their parts pretty damn well for the most part, minus Big Show's constant overacting and crying all them weeks ago. I feel as though Orton/Bryan has now gotten to the point where they need a decisive finish on Sunday and to move away from one another until the turn of the year because I feel as though the story is kind of treading water and not really pushing on. As soon as this program started I initially thought we would get a couple of months of Bryan being screwed out of the title, he takes a couple of months away from Orton due to being made to work his way back up and possibly feuds with some other corporate member until the Rumble where he gains a chance at redemption by winning the Rumble (from an early number i'd assume) before eventually toppling the regime at WrestleMania and taking the title.
As far as things stand, I think the finishes to both of their PPV matches have been horrible and I really don't understand the booking behind it. The bigger picture has been to make HHH the somewhat evil boss that only wants what's best for business and that's not Bryan. Orton is the undeserving, hand picked face of the WWE and WWE Champion and Bryan is the underdog trying to overcome adversity and become the champion against HHH's wishes. Fast forward to Night Of Champions.
As we're all aware, Bryan won the title here under dubious circumstances and this is where my first fault with the booking is. Granted, he got the title revoked from him the night after and they wanted to try and get him some sympathy I guess, but why on earth would you have Bryan overcome the odds on the first time of trying? Would it have not been better for Orton's heel character to retain the title on the night under shady circumstances say Bryan's foot under the rope or a fast count in his favour? Would it have no been better for Bryan's underdog story to be screwed on the night (and in my opinion at least) not cheapen his eventual title win? I also believe it would have helped HHH too by sympathising with Bryan a tad but telling him he can't change what has happened.
Battleground rolls around and we get that god awful finish that was just flat as fuck and pretty much robbed people of the money they paid for the PPV, although the Tag Match softened the blow a bit. Again, I don't understand why they booked it this way and I don't see who it really helped other than Big Show. Now I know he's the 4th wheel in all of this and have no problem with what they've gone on to do with him but I don't believe they should have sabotaged the main event of a PPV for him. I've not thought about what the actual finish should have been, but off the top of my head i'd probably go with a ref bump, Big Show knocks out Bryan and Orton retains and it still plays into the ongoing storyline I mentioned earlier. If they were really desperate to make it clear Show wasn't a full fledged heel, have him KO Orton after the match is over.
While we're on the general subject though, has anything ever come out about Armstrong's involvement in that finish because I still don't understand it. I know Armstrong implied Bryan was in on it and then HHH fired him later on and vowed to take care of him which suggested he was in on it which then makes absolutely no sense at all to me logically.
Anyway yeah, I feel like i've rambled on now but like I say I'm enjoying this storyline but just feel as though it's leaving a hell of a lot to be desired when it comes to crunch time. Am I just being impatient? I don't believe I am because like I outlined I was perfectly fine for Bryan to not win the strap until Mania. Or are other people having similar feelings towards this angle? Lemme hear it.
So let me start by saying that up until now i've really been enjoying this feud and think all 4 guys & Steph have played their parts pretty damn well for the most part, minus Big Show's constant overacting and crying all them weeks ago. I feel as though Orton/Bryan has now gotten to the point where they need a decisive finish on Sunday and to move away from one another until the turn of the year because I feel as though the story is kind of treading water and not really pushing on. As soon as this program started I initially thought we would get a couple of months of Bryan being screwed out of the title, he takes a couple of months away from Orton due to being made to work his way back up and possibly feuds with some other corporate member until the Rumble where he gains a chance at redemption by winning the Rumble (from an early number i'd assume) before eventually toppling the regime at WrestleMania and taking the title.
As far as things stand, I think the finishes to both of their PPV matches have been horrible and I really don't understand the booking behind it. The bigger picture has been to make HHH the somewhat evil boss that only wants what's best for business and that's not Bryan. Orton is the undeserving, hand picked face of the WWE and WWE Champion and Bryan is the underdog trying to overcome adversity and become the champion against HHH's wishes. Fast forward to Night Of Champions.
As we're all aware, Bryan won the title here under dubious circumstances and this is where my first fault with the booking is. Granted, he got the title revoked from him the night after and they wanted to try and get him some sympathy I guess, but why on earth would you have Bryan overcome the odds on the first time of trying? Would it have not been better for Orton's heel character to retain the title on the night under shady circumstances say Bryan's foot under the rope or a fast count in his favour? Would it have no been better for Bryan's underdog story to be screwed on the night (and in my opinion at least) not cheapen his eventual title win? I also believe it would have helped HHH too by sympathising with Bryan a tad but telling him he can't change what has happened.
Battleground rolls around and we get that god awful finish that was just flat as fuck and pretty much robbed people of the money they paid for the PPV, although the Tag Match softened the blow a bit. Again, I don't understand why they booked it this way and I don't see who it really helped other than Big Show. Now I know he's the 4th wheel in all of this and have no problem with what they've gone on to do with him but I don't believe they should have sabotaged the main event of a PPV for him. I've not thought about what the actual finish should have been, but off the top of my head i'd probably go with a ref bump, Big Show knocks out Bryan and Orton retains and it still plays into the ongoing storyline I mentioned earlier. If they were really desperate to make it clear Show wasn't a full fledged heel, have him KO Orton after the match is over.
While we're on the general subject though, has anything ever come out about Armstrong's involvement in that finish because I still don't understand it. I know Armstrong implied Bryan was in on it and then HHH fired him later on and vowed to take care of him which suggested he was in on it which then makes absolutely no sense at all to me logically.
Anyway yeah, I feel like i've rambled on now but like I say I'm enjoying this storyline but just feel as though it's leaving a hell of a lot to be desired when it comes to crunch time. Am I just being impatient? I don't believe I am because like I outlined I was perfectly fine for Bryan to not win the strap until Mania. Or are other people having similar feelings towards this angle? Lemme hear it.