"you hear", so there are no legitimate numbers then? Then you cannot even compare. WWE release their numbers every quarter. If UFCs worth is just speculated we cannot even compare the two since it would be like comparing a cat to an imaginary one.
Captain America, realistic? WTF? It's a franchise about a super soldier fighting other super soldiers and super terrorists, also featuring a dude in a wing suit. Iron Man is fucking sci fi. Batman is about to fight a god and an unkillable alien using power armor, the Avengers features a super soldier, a god, a massive rage monster and fight off alien invasions and killer robots. Also the Arrow is about to go time travelling. It's the other way around. They are mainly fantastical medias with hints of realism not the other way around.
Come Christmas, a movie about space adventures is going to most likely blow every realistic movie away at the box office.
A world were Brock is bigger than Inoki...... lol. Not hating on Brock But what he did for the UFC has already been done a lot of times before, to similar results.
http://www.mmamania.com/2014/3/25/5...white-3-5-billion-or-more-financial-times-mma
Now Dana could just be talking out his ass and we'll have to see...but I highly doubt he'd want this to go public and then completely be wrong. And I do know that Vince, personally, took a 350 million dollar hit, which isn't peanut money; thus, his company took a hit as well, especially in the stock market. This can happen and he can recover....but, I'm leaning more towards UFC as of now. could be wrong, but seems pretty educated at this point. not just "hear say." And, I simply brought up the money thing because people are acting as if fantasy and script always kill a more real approach...I was merely stating that this isn't always the case.
Captain America...enhanced by science (that could exist and isn't completely off the charts) is a super solider....not too fake. Yes, we may have hovering skateboards and cars soon, too....a guy with gliding wings isn't too off. And, you missed my point. The fighting, emotion, and ways they conduct the story are all aimed at being more "real." Again, unless they have too (someone like Thor is hard to portray as "real") fantasy isn't always as big of a direction anymore. They have these hero's fighting in New York city and mention it in the movie.
Batman is now fighting Superman (sometimes fantasy is needed, especially with Justice League coming out), but before that, a point you left out, he fought Bane, Joker, and Ra's al Ghul. All portrayed as more real, believable characters. Joker is a believable psychopath, bane is a huge fighting machine, and Ra's al Ghul is the real like mentor who trained bruce in all his batman-like ways. Dark Knight was a box office smash hit. Dark Knight Rises was, too....
Avengers I use the same example I gave for captain America. Some needed fantasy but all aimed at being more believable...makes you think...."could something like this really happen?" Arrow is just now about to time travel...everything else in the entire series is more real centered and he fights enemies similar to batmans, sometimes even the same ones. I guess this boils down to opinions vary.
Yes, Star wars has always been big and that's fine. Fantasy can and always will make money; this doesn't disprove my point. Dark Knight was a very "real" approach and it crushed the box office. Jurassic world is based off of what we know about real dinosaurs and it crushed the box office. Obviously some exaggeration is involved with movies like this but you get my point.
I actually agree with you on the Brock thing....I really do....just feel that Brock's was slightly different.