Bret Hart puts over current WWE Stars

[Great One]

No, I am not saying his book is "a bible". I didnt even talk about it until YOU brought it up.

Well, it sure seems that way if you admit it all as fact and percieve that none can be lies because it's in a book.

YOU are not inside the mind of Bret The Hitman Hart, therefore you have no logical or factual basis to speak on what you think he thinks. I am saying, and have always said, you can only take what someone says as what it is, nothing more, nothing less. You are the one who is reading into it. "Oh well he would really think this if this happened" but since you don't know Bret, you can't say that, and therefore you dont know shit. End of discussion.

I am taking it for what it is, you are the one taking it for more than it is and trying to incorporate and include irrelevant points into the conclusion. And I recall my post saying "he would think differently if he was in the ring with so and so", nowhere does he CLEARLY say something to prove me differently.

 

[Kaedon]

Well, it sure seems that way if you admit it all as fact and percieve that none can be lies because it's in a book.

I am taking it for what it is, you are the one taking it for more than it is and trying to incorporate and include irrelevant points into the conclusion. And I recall my post saying "he would think differently if he was in the ring with so and so", nowhere does he CLEARLY say something to prove me differently.

And tell me where he CLEARLY says something to prove you right? Exactly. And what else am I incorporating? I said "Bret likes Batista, Cena, and Rey otherwise he wouldnt have said it" you are saying "Well I know he'd think differnet because....." and then not providing anything solid to prove your point. YOU are the one reading into it, YOU are the one who is saying "I know he'd think different", despite your lack of proof. You are the same kind of mental midget who does "well since you can't prove God doesnt exist, he does". It's called the "Informal logical fallacy" or the "appeal to ignorance" fallacy. "Well since you can't prove my comment about Bret Hart wrong, it must be right"

 

[Great One]

And tell me where he CLEARLY says something to prove you right? Exactly. And what else am I incorporating? I said "Bret likes Batista, Cena, and Rey otherwise he wouldnt have said it" you are saying "Well I know he'd think differnet because....." and then not providing anything solid to prove your point. YOU are the one reading into it, YOU are the one who is saying "I know he'd think different", despite your lack of proof. You are the same kind of mental midget who does "well since you can't prove God doesnt exist, he does". It's called the "Informal logical fallacy" or the "appeal to ignorance" fallacy. "Well since you can't prove my comment about Bret Hart wrong, it must be right"

And you are the one who ALWAYS has to be right. And you proved that when you tried to argue me on a point where I wasn't really wrong in saying so, where it was clearly a sarcastic remark which I could still just as easily provide evidence to support. And no, this is a much different case than such, since I was primarily basing off a book and it's more of an "if" it was to happen sort of thing, you can just play the it didn't happen, so it doesn't matter card, which is fine, but my point is if it did happen then he would think differently... which I also provided the evidence to.

 

[Kaedon]

And you are the one who ALWAYS has to be right. And you proved that when you tried to argue me on a point where I wasn't really wrong in saying so, where it was clearly a sarcastic remark which I could still just as easily provide evidence to support. And no, this is a much different case than such, since I was primarily basing off a book and it's more of an "if" it was to happen sort of thing, you can just play the it didn't happen, so it doesn't matter card, which is fine, but my point is if it did happen then he would think differently... which I also provided the evidence to.

You have provided ZERO EVIDENCE. You have theories. You have "Well I think this would happen if this happened." In what world is that evidence? Can you prove for a FACT Bret Hart would say "You know what Batista? You're a dick, and I now don't like the emotion and charisma you bring" or "You know what John Cena, I don't like the way the WWE is booking you against me, so I do not like the emotion and charisma you bring." Can you? No, you cant. All you can do is guess. Therefore you DONT know, therefore you ARE wrong for assuming you can be in the head of Bret Hart, and therefore you dont know shit.