TAB said:
Is there really a point in arguing over something that will probably never be proven? I personally think he was a pedo I mean why the hell would anyone make up something like that?
That's a bit of a contradiction don't ya think?
TAB said:
If this was anyone else, just a random guy you would have been all saying how he was a pedophile no matter if he was found not guilty or not. Face it you are only saying he didn't do it because he was a popular muscian.
That may be why I'm discussing this, seeing as if he wasn't famous the thought never would have crossed my mind. But I've never been a fan of his and I've always made the jokes about him, but at the same time, I could tell it was an extortion act. Thousands of kids went through his home and did the same activities that the first kid did, yet he was the only one to come out. When one person comes out, usually the other victims feel safe enough to come out as well...and there were no other ones out of thousands of kids until 10 years later, which was pretty much a repeat of the situation.
TBKB said:
He said in an interview that he did what he did with children because he took God's way of loving children as gospel. He never specifically said he molested them, but I'd say that's damn close enough to saying it.
How so? Just because someone loves something doesn't mean there's a sexual attraction to it. Hell, I love certain actors and wrestlers in the sense that I'll always try to defend them if I see an unjust opinion, and I'll always be a fan, and I'd help them out in whatever way I could, but there is absolutely no sexual attraction to them. And just the opposite, most of the females that I'm sexually attracted to pretty much mean nothing to me beyond that. Like Rihanna & Beyoncé....their hot, that's it. I don't like their music, I don't care what they do in their life, and I don't care about their success.....all I want is for them to look good so I can have someone to think about when I'm doing my wife.
no:
