True. For whatever reason normally these award organisations dislike anything that manages to be a huge commercial success and be a mainstream hit. They shouldn't assume that big money means poor quality just like the opposite is true.
I think part of the theory is that those blockbusters are already successful enough without getting awards recnition.
Trouble is Troy most of the films you mentioned are not good popcorn flicks. The Hangover movies are just repeating the teen blueprint from such 80s movies as Animal House and Brachor Party, films which weren't that good to begin with but at least served a purpose at the time. It is not a genre which ages well and these films are just sexist and unfunny.
F&F is just a dated 70s/80s style action film, which comes across as "can you top this cinema" with no sense of character or narrative. And with the exception of the fact they have made money, tell me why world needs six of the damn things?
Star Trek is the one I would stick up for as JJA did a good job with the first one and as of yet it has not out stayed its welcome.