Backstage news on Undertaker's Wrestlemania opponent

[Farooq]

Lol'd on the books. Doubt it is on the books for sure, just sounds like a fanboy really. Not to say it's not a possibility, I myself think it's a high possibility, but I think it's just a fanboy report like the Royal Rumble winners. Anyhow, I wouldn't want to see it personally. I think Undertaker should go up against Cena instead. That being said, I wouldn't mind seeing Undertaker vs Lesnar if it does happen. I can see the build up being badass for this.

 

[seabs]

I'd rather see someone who can benefit from the rub year around, same as Brock vs someone. You have these special attractions use them to help guys who can entertain year round rather than blowing your load in one go. It'll make tons of money though which is all that matters.

 

[Action Jackson]

Lol'd on the books. Doubt it is on the books for sure, just sounds like a fanboy really. Not to say it's not a possibility, I myself think it's a high possibility, but I think it's just a fanboy report like the Royal Rumble winners. Anyhow, I wouldn't want to see it personally. I think Undertaker should go up against Cena instead. That being said, I wouldn't mind seeing Undertaker vs Lesnar if it does happen. I can see the build up being badass for this.

Yeah of course. Every single thread here is based on bullshit "reports". I stopped pointing it out, when Brad 96 had a little hissy fit about how "Everyone knows they're BS". Everyone knows, yet they still discuss this shit as if it's fact or even a rumor with any validity? That seems pretty contradictory, but whatever. Wrestling fans on the internet... they're a weird goober bunch.

 

[Farooq]

Yeah of course. Every single thread here is based on bullshit "reports". I stopped pointing it out, when Brad 96 had a little hissy fit about how "Everyone knows they're BS". Everyone knows, yet they still discuss this shit as if it's fact or even a rumor with any validity? That seems pretty contradictory, but whatever. Wrestling fans on the internet... they're a weird goober bunch.

I think it's more of a discussion of possibilities is all. I just catch it silly when the dirtsheets say they "reported" it, when any means anybody could say something similar. I think Undertaker/Lesnar possibility is worth the discussion, there's nothing wrong with it, but I just have high doubts someone within WWE told them that it was on the books for sure.

 

[Action Jackson]

I think it's more of a discussion of possibilities is all. I just catch it silly when the dirtsheets say they "reported" it, when any means anybody could say something similar. I think Undertaker/Lesnar possibility is worth the discussion, there's nothing wrong with it, but I just have high doubts someone within WWE told them that it was on the books for sure.

Yeah I love discussing the possibility, What else are we here for if not to have talks like that? It's specifically the report thing I'm talking about.

Like I said, I would certainly enjoy Cena or Lesnar vs Taker. Both of those names have been tossed around for a year or two now as possibilities.

 

[Snowman1]

Cena turning heel for this? No! That would be terrible.

As much as I've bitched and bashed this company for their overreliance on part timer vs part timer crap... Daniel Bryan will be in a really big spot on the show... Punk will be in his third big spot at Wrestlemania, hopefully with a good character... The Shield will be doing well for themselves... Most of the star-making stuff happens other times throughout the year while Mania is a pile of shit... There's really not that much to fuss about. They've made enough stars to make me okay with letting a couple of part timers work some of their last matches together, and it'll be one hell of a show.

However, if Triple H and Big Show have a match on here, then we'll have a problem.

My only complaint is the Cena thing, really want that feud to happen before Taker retires. And this felt like the right time for him to have that match and go. As long as it happens, I'm okay with it.

 

[BrockLesnarFanForLife]

My man Brock should be the one to take the streak

 

[Nice Person]

ONE MORE MATCH...ONE MORE WIN....... THEN WALK AWAY INTO THE HALL OF FAME.............

 

[Aids Johnson]

Damn, i expected it to be Miz vs Undertaker. You can't win them all.

 

[HIGH FLYER]

22-0

 

[Swift]

I'd love to see this. Fuck the smarky cunts.

 

[Lockard 23]

I'd love to see this. Fuck the smarky cunts.

Funny how there's someone with your exact avatar named Smarky Kunt over on WF. Hmmm....

On topic, if those awful rumors of Lesnar possibly turning babyface after Wrestlemania XXX are true, then I guess this is the way they'll get there - having Heyman devastated that Lesnar himself failed to break the streak as well and having Ryback ambush and attack him and lay him out or something. (Although the idea of Ryback replacing Lesnar as Heyman's new permanent muscle is all kinds of funny considering he can barely win a match at all.)

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

hahahah K Lock the Dick busted this ho

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/250737-smarkykunt.html

fucking WF scum.

 

[Trip in the Head]

Honestly the thought of that match does not excite me much. I would watch it and enjoy it probably, but I wouldn't mark out for it. And I'm a big taker fan. Not so much with Brock. I feel like taker's gotten to the age where, if it weren't scripted, taker would lose that specific match. I BELIEVED that taker could legitimately beat CM Punk, kayfabe or not. Lesnar, not so much. So if the streak did not end I would be pretty BLAH about it, but thats just my opinion.

If I could pick a match, I would rather see Reigns vs Lesnar, but I know this is all about Taker's WM opponent so whatever.

 

[Action Jackson]

Thinking that Lesnar has the upper hand the whole time is what would make Taker winning that much better.

Tombstone that Mr. Potato Head lookin' fool a few times.