I still feel that a better comparison for AEW would be upstart TNA, if the Jarretts had Turner money. A new company with little to no history, started and run by wrestlers, using a combination of top indie talents and guys recognizable from the big promotions. Hell, it may not be weekly, but theyre even starting out with a PPV-only model.
The money is really enough to be the difference maker. And any new wrestling company is going to start out with little to no history since it is a new company, will likely be run by wrestlers as nearly every wrestling company in the world is run by wrestlers and likely uses a combo of top indie talents and recognizable guys from big promotions. I don't actually think anyone can start a new wrestling company without those thing.
Honestly, I think if they really want to "evolve wrestling" or whatever their stupid mission is, they should be looking to get a weekly major wrestling show onto one of the big streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, or even YouTube Red (or whatever YouTube's streaming thing is called). Streaming services are the future of television after all, and are growing in the number of users every day. Capitol Wrestling, House of Hardcore, AAA, and Impact (among others) are all starting to use Twitch as a way to broaden their audience and make it feel more interactive. WWE even is starting to do this in recent years with the whole Facebook Watch thing.
You seem very bent out of shape about this. If you don't like the idea, don't watch it and it will absolutely not affect you in any way. I think Friends and Full House are two of the worst shows ever, but my solution was not to watch them. If you don't watch nor discuss the things that you don't like, you'll be a lot happier.
I get your point, and I'm not entirely disagreeing with you on it. I'm not totally shitting on it and am willing to give it a fair shot, because at the end of the day I'm a stupid wrestling fan who will basically watch anything if wrestling is on the marquee. I am simply just not thrilled with this card in the slightest, and am genuinely curious as to what makes AEW so special compared to other "major" companies on TV.
The biggest problem with professional wrestling in the world right now is WWE. WWE not only offers the most popular wrestling product in the world, they have their "Sports Entertainment" label which they support by way too much story telling, way too many backstage talks and just not as much wrestling as a wrestling show should have. So they want to offer a product that is different than WWE. Every company has a mission, it's sort of the entire point of capitalism. People who like it more than WWE will watch it, if they don't like it, they won't watch it.
This is more towards the point I was making. I just don't know how I feel about it until they do something other than a big PPV. Will they still be running 15-20,000 seat arenas every week?
We won't know until it happens. This is just a start. Just like the WWE Network was just a start and I was having this discussion with so many people who insisted the network would fail (I remembered their names and I went back and mocked them afterward). Every company has to have a starting place. The beginning product is rarely what the eventual product will look like.
Or will they be running smaller venues and only using big ones for the major shows?
Is Jim Ross on commentary a good idea at this point?
I think it's a great idea. And I don't even like JR. But he is likely the most popular commentator in wrestling history and he actually talks about the matches. He hasn't lost any of his talent. WWE has been stupid for the past ten years, not taking advantage of his play by play. Even though I am not a JR guy, it will be easier watching AEW matches than matches in WWE where Michael Cole talks about Justin Bieber.
Will AEW end up being anything more than a glorified circle jerk for Cody and his friends like their YouTube show?
Cody is not in charge. He is an executive but this is not just a case of a billionaire giving some wrestlers some money and letting them do whatever they want. The Khans have some advantages that TNA did not have. First, Panda Energy was not nearly as big as a company as Khan's company. In fact, Panda's highest net worth for the entire company has barely been above $500 million. Plus, the Khans have experience with sports teams, owning two of them. And they're going to be hands on, unlike the Carter. Not even Dixie Carter really did anything, but everything I've been reading seems to indicate that the Khan's are not just giving Cody and blank check and total control.
Will they be able to continue to generate the buzz they have now for their once in a while shows once they start running weekly? I do think there is potential in AEW, and again, I'm gonna give it a fair chance. I think it's fair to be skeptical of promises being made or ideas being offered, though, when there are other companies out there that have already been doing the same thing and have only seen moderate results once the initial buzz wore off
Every starting company has questions. All we can do is wait and see. I like seeing, so I am going to give it a shot. If it sucks, I'll stop watching.