Still there is no solid proof that the towers were brought down by the fire.
*Sigh* There is more proof that they were brought down by fire than anything else. Any of the other suggestions have been thoroughly discredited.
I've heard about the theory which says that the towers were designed in such a way that they could have collapsed due to the fire which they did... but I've also heard of the theory which says that the towers were designed in such a way that they couldn't have collapsed due to such a fire.
Indecisive bastard.
'There were a lot of hydrocarbons in there that gave out a lot of heat'[/I]
Okay. So that made those huge towers collapse? You gotta be kidding me.
Not just that, but these objects are what allowed a sustained burn to happen and what allowed the temperature to rise high enough to have steel lose it's strength. Those hydrocarbons may well have been the catalyst.
There are a lot of other 'scientifically proven' theories which state that the towers couldn't have collapsed the way that they did.
I'm sure that there were, but I don't see anyone with any kind of technical knowledge stating that steel does not behave in this manner.