TT.Tiger tamer

[Evil Austin]

Yeah my post above was a mistake I posted there before seeing XBA's post.

 

[comicgeekelly]

I've got an inquiry.

Do you all tend to focus more on booking (logical, progressive storylines) or match writing?

And don't say both, because if every match is long and epic, then we can't appreciate the booking to go along with it. And if there it is a storyline-based fed, then the matches are likely to be small and focus more about the story behind them.

Personally I care much more about my booking than my match writing. Good matches draw people in, but good stories keep them from leaving.

 

[seX-Power]

Personally I care much more about my booking than my match writing. Good matches draw people in, but good stories keep them from leaving.

Ditto.

The storylines matter much more to me.

 

[The Rated R CMStar]

I had a little problem today.

For some reason today, most of my Word documents appeared corrupt, and just didnt open. Finally, I had no other choice but to delete it.

I only saved WrestleBowl and most of the Royal Rumble PPV, as I had them save on my flash disk. Anyways, I am not rewriting what I lost for the Royal Rumble, so I'll be posting what I have.

Luckily I have practically the entire RR PPV, except the RR match, which only goes until the 4th entrant. What I will try to rewrite is the ending, but that's all.


I am really sorry and I hope i doesn't matter.

 

[Evil Austin]

That totally sucks CMS, it happens to all of us at one point or another. Last week I thought my Turning Point PPV was corrupt but I managed to email it to myself and save it. Before I had to reboot the computer and empty it all out from some sort of virus.

By the way I read some of that RR Second half like until the begining of the Brian Philman / Hart match. Ill finish in the next day or two and Ill review it as promised.

 

[THE Renegade Diesel]

Here's a question guys.

I'm going to form a dominant stable similar to Evolution in my BTB. But probably way more dominant. With two, and half main eventers (one will be in between the upper mid card, and main event), a mid carder, and a tag team. Am I putting to many people into the stable?

 

[Emperor DC]

Considering the many members the NWO had, no.

 

[Qwake]

Here's a question guys.

I'm going to form a dominant stable similar to Evolution in my BTB. But probably way more dominant. With two, and half main eventers (one will be in between the upper mid card, and main event), a mid carder, and a tag team. Am I putting to many people into the stable?

Well if you're going for an evolution type of stable I would say yes. I think it may get a little cluttered writing with 6 guys and I would presume they would be talking at the same time, it might make it tougher to write. Also with 6 guys I could see ALOT of interferences which wouldn't be good. I would just go with the 2 main eventers, the upper mid carders and the mid card guy, the tag team wouldn't really need to be there because if the stable needs to have a tag match there would be 4 of them already. That's what I would do anyways, hope this helps you make up your mind a little...

 

[PARANoIR]

Here's a question guys.

I'm going to form a dominant stable similar to Evolution in my BTB. But probably way more dominant. With two, and half main eventers (one will be in between the upper mid card, and main event), a mid carder, and a tag team. Am I putting to many people into the stable?

I've seen something like this done in BTB a couple of times now, quite successfully too. I say go for it.

 

[Evil Austin]

By the way a good person between Mid and Main Eventer to use would be MVP great on the mic and can go in the ring. Just a suggestion if you haven't planned the people already.

 

[The Rated R CMStar]

I don't see personally MVP as a stable guy. It would only work if he's kept as the wild card, with him constantly dropping comments that he's too good for the stable, things like that

 

[CT Styles]

I'm backkkk, Age of Evolution is still going; just debating whether to keep the matches I've done so far on the next RAW recap or full as always. I've done two matches recap so far but I'm not sure whether to go back and do them in full. Anyways, I'm back!

 

[seX-Power]

Welcome Back, CT. I too am going recap for the third week of my BTB and you do good recaps so if its easier on you then I have no problem with you doing recaps.

 

[Qwake]

I don't know why you guys are doing recaps as a substitute instead of doing full shows. There is nothing wrong with doing recaps but it seems you guys are doing them just because you don't have enough time at the moment to do full shows. If thats the case I think you guys should just wait and write it out in full slowly, I would rather see a full show that takes longer then a recapped show thats done quicker. But if you are doung them purely because you want to then thats alright, but I guess its not up to me and you guys can rcap or not whether you guys want to but I am just saying, if you're only post recaps to quickly get a show up I say just use the extra time to get a full show up.

Other then that, I have officaially returned to the BTB section from about a month away from posting or something, feels like a month anyways. I have done quite a bit of writing as of late and I am currently up to my next PPV which of course you guys probably won't care about but whatever The longer I'm here the more reviews that go around imo.

 

[CT Styles]

It makes it easier to focus and progress the story-lines. I prefer writing promos too.