IWF Records #1 - Wrestling Station and Small Show

[Airfixx]

Comment wasn't really called for now was it?

Why?

Was it gratuitously nasty, offensive or similar?

Given that this is HIAC and considering the kind of abuse and persecution regularly dished out here, I don't see the problem... It was even on topic.

If this was written about Blaze, Ironman, TSS (for example) everyone else would have joined in by now and stuck the boot in, but that's ok, I don't require my opinion to be vailidated by a sheep-like mentality.

 

[THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps]

Why?

Was it gratuitously nasty, offensive or similar?

Given that this is HIAC and considering the kind of abuse and persecution regularly dished out here, I don't see the problem... It was even on topic.

If this was written about Blaze, Ironman, TSS (for example) everyone else would have joined in by now and stuck the boot in, but that's ok, I don't require my opinion to be vailidated by a sheep-like mentality.

You mean the useless members?

 

[Airfixx]

I said that I not posting in this thread but I need to clarify one last thing for the last time.

HIAT is where I post "funny" if some people find them funny images or posts. Thats what that section is about.
And stop trying to make yourself look as if you know much, I dont agree and I dont care if you do anyway.
The Batista comments are for some people they know who they are. It shows that you dont know much about this forum. So stop assumming you predictions about why I said this or that about a certain superstar.

I can go on with a debate on something that would interest me to debate. If you want a debate challenge with me, so be it. Its not important who will win or lose, but the most important is what will be pulled up the table from both sides. Its like a survey meter, that you can judge someone if he knows or is having knowledge.

Stop trying to sound as if you are smart and im a stupid or a having slow thinking process. Try to be respectful in a debate if you are saying that you know how to debate. Im not trying to disrespect you in anyway man. I told you very clear that I have my own mood and my own interests. Thats why every human has his own interests and we all are not the same.

And you comment about that I dont contribute for the wrestling stuff, you are wrong. Thats not true. I do in many ways.

Now and for the last time, if you want a wrestlng debate against me, im more than welcoming you for it. No hard feelings, and no disrespect whatsoever. Just as I said earlier, that everyone has something that is leening towards more than others. It doesnt mean that im dumb or whatever the thing you had in your mind. Just stop this uncalled low blows mind me speaking, and make a wrestling debate on anything if you want. If you dont want, as you wish. I dont have to prove anything for you nor you need to prove anything to me.

Jeez.... I had never considered you to be dumb... Until NOW that is.


What the fuck is all that about?

[Maybe this would be the time to stay true to your stating you're not going to reply.... Just some friendly advice, like....]

 

[Airfixx]

You mean the useless members?

If that's your opinion of them, fine.

I've both laughed at them and stuck up for them at different times, but bollocks to anyone that thinks they should be subject a different set of 'rules' to WS or any other member.


I'll end my involvement in this thread by restating my original point:

The way rep is given out by the members makes a total mockery of it meaning anything... And WS, regardless of being the 'worst' member or not (I don't think he is, btw), being BY FAR the most rep'd member is a glaring example of why.

 

[Airfixx]

Dont talk or make fun about my religion again, I edited your post. Even if its HIAT. Thats the only thing I dont accept is making fun of religions.

I'm pretty sure he is entitled to his opinion...

Yeah, can we please get some IMPARTIAL staff clarrification on this latter...

Especially as...

10/02/2008 04:45 PM <The Italian Outsider> Monk can i make fun of religions in hiat?
10/02/2008 04:46 PM <monkeystyle> of course

 

[monkeystyle]

Why?

Was it gratuitously nasty, offensive or similar?

Given that this is HIAC and considering the kind of abuse and persecution regularly dished out here, I don't see the problem... It was even on topic.

If this was written about Blaze, Ironman, TSS (for example) everyone else would have joined in by now and stuck the boot in, but that's ok, I don't require my opinion to be vailidated by a sheep-like mentality.

I am mostly speaking to the fact that it came completely out of nowhere, and had no precedent.

How long have you been waiting to do this?

 

[Airfixx]

Your orginal post said nothing of the sort, but regardless....

It was a reponse to this thread... Pure and simple.

The Crux:

The way rep is given out by the members makes a total mockery of it meaning anything... And WS, regardless of being the 'worst' member or not (I don't think he is, btw), being BY FAR the most rep'd member is a glaring example of why.

 

[monkeystyle]

Are you seriously complaining about rep right now?

 

[monkeystyle]

Because y'know that whole respect level thing?

If you are actually bitching about rep, which it surely seems you are, the bottom is going to fall out of that respect tank awfully quickly.

 

[Airfixx]

Bitching about it, no... I don't hold my rep count with precious regard if that's what you mean.

However within the context of this thread, I felt that there was a point that could be made...

I'm generally baffled by some of the reasons why some of my rep points have been given (I'm hardly likely to question why I got it if I'm simply a rep-whore am i?)... And more specifically to this thread, I am even more baffled how WS could end up with the most rep out of anyone.

Edit:

I understand that I may have said something negative about 'one of the boyz' and am prepared to deal with any 'ripples' it may create with regards to my acceptance within the 'community', but that should take nothing away from WHY it was said in the first place and, rollin' with what said in an earlier post, I honestly don't think if I'd have commented about the posting 'quality' (for want of a better expression) of one of the IWF whipping boys it would have been reacted to the way it has.

 

[monkeystyle]

WS does a lot for the site.

 

[C4]

WS gets rep because he deserves it

I don't have a problem with that because I know how much he does for the forums and for random fucks, like me.

 

[Italian Outsider]

I'm generally baffled by some of the reasons why some of my rep points have been given (I'm hardly likely to question why I got it if I'm simply a rep-whore am i?)... And more specifically to this thread, I am even more baffled how WS could end up with the most rep out of anyone.

WS does a lot for the site.

leeching things he doesn't even check if good or not,stealing gfx ,stalking members,pming you when you don't rep him enough, and asking ''somebody'' to remove his neg reps are random examples

 

[Airfixx]

WS does a lot for the site.

Fair enough.... Assuming you mean as a staff member, thats the only tangiable response I've had, besides, I've been prompted do little more that re-re-re-re-hash my post since this debate ensued and now I'm probably just as bored of it as the rest of the peeps that may be reading this.


Btw, any comment about the religion thing?

Nice to know what the rules are....

 

[Airfixx]

WS gets rep because he deserves it

I don't have a problem with that because I know how much he does for the forums and for random fucks, like me.

So why did you rep me saying "keep on slagging him off" (or similar)???





Edit: Actual quote"Fantastic, INSULT HIM more and you get MORE REP".