TT.Tiger tamer

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Emperor DC

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
^Good for you.

It's not that hard to start and retain a good 3 way feud. It is common sense. You have a challenger step up for the title, but another man comes out and declares his dependance on getting the title, and thus a 3-way feud starts.

It's not rocket science.
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
CT Styles said:
Do you think my matches should be shorter?
i noticed in your new BTB they have been a bit shorter. Yours don't need to get shorter, because they hold my interest personally, which is something some longer matches don't always do.
 

CT Styles

Guest
Emperor DC said:
Do you agree this section needs an upheaval? I see people that are good BTB'ers, and do things right, and then I see idiots just walking around asking for reviews, plugging thier BTB at every chance and so on.
I don't mean to sound like an idiot but what's an upheaval?
 

CT Styles

Guest
Look, I don't know. That is a fairly good point. But what would we redo? Just completely reset the BTB section?
 

Switchy

Active Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
44
Location
Bristol, England
Now it's time for the retirn of the original BTB Q&A thread with yours truly so from now on feel free to ask me any questions and I will answer them

Thanks.
 

Gards Jr.

Active Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Age
30
Location
Australia
Good to see you back Switch Man.

Why arent you on MSN right now

What do you think of BKB's and My BTB. Although He put it all together so pretty much his BTB at the Moment lol.
 

Moonlight Drive

Guest
Why did you decide to bring this thread back?

What did you think of Part 1 of my PPV?

What was your favourite 'dream Match' you got to book in your fed?
 

Emperor DC

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
No, not completly, but I can't be the only one that sees so many thinga awry. I know a few of the members here. They are 'rejects' that never got the job done at another site, and instead fled here with thier threads.

The stupid reviewing system, the plugging of threads, the 'Ask CT Styles' threads. I respect you for what you have done in the past, but can't the questions of people go through PM or into the Bookers thread, but make it a general Discussion Thread?

The forum just seems clogged to me and puts me off posting anymore shows.
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
Emperor DC said:
No, not completly, but I can't be the only one that sees so many thinga awry. I know a few of the members here. They are 'rejects' that never got the job done at another site, and instead fled here with thier threads.

The stupid reviewing system, the plugging of threads, the 'Ask CT Styles' threads. I respect you for what you have done in the past, but can't the questions of people go through PM or into the Bookers thread, but make it a general Discussion Thread?

The forum just seems clogged to me and puts me off posting anymore shows.
I have to answer, becauuse I feel like it lol.

I like the chat room with the threads, because it keeps the actual BTB thread strictly about the BTB, not flooded with other annoying things.

Yes the review system is flawed, we all know that. Some of us review differently because of that.

We do have a lot of noobs, but they always leave eventually, after failing. And with registrations not being allowed to the forum at this time, the BTB section should become a lot less flooded with shitty bookers.

If you don't want to post another show, meh, that's up to you.
 

CT Styles

Guest
I made this thread not just as an 'Ask CT Styles Thread' but so it was my own thread, so I don't have to make a new thread for my rants(like I posted above) or my questions. I did this to keep the Lounge clean. I know as well, that a lot of these people are rejects from other forums, I look around at other BTB sections. They have all decided to come here because this place is the most active BTB section, mainly because of that, but also because of bookers like CMS and XBA and Anigma, these are all some of the best bookers on the net and fortunately, they are devoted bookers and they have chosen this site to be their site, if you see what I mean. This is the best BTB section on the net in many people's opinions and so many people are always going to sign up because of that very reason. I don't think a upheaval would do much, it would just reset the place and people would go back to what they are doing.

Actually, one idea I just had was like This Guy has his 'High Rollers' club, maybe we could have like an 'Elite Bookers Club' where we have our own section for people who aren't just going to quit after one show. It's just a suggestion but, possibly a good idea.
 

Emperor DC

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
I know I am a new guy, but I am not new to BTB in general. I have been around the block and I know so much clutter is not a good thing. On the three sites I write on, they are all clean and crisp, no extra threads making the place look untidy and so on. I know many people would not be in favour of a reset, but I personally would, just because it gives a place a whole new feeling, a new start to give a fresh impetous to people to book and write.

I don't know, it is entirley up to the Moderators. I'm only trying to help the guys that I see are really interested in BTB and good for the site, not just here to write and plug thier BTB's at every single chance.
 

Emperor DC

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
I'm not entirley sure. I have heard it mentioned at a site I activley post at and it was washed away with other ideas. I'm sure it would just be another case of another idea cluttering stuff.

I understand people think this is one of the best BTB sites, but well, those people are just plain dumb. I'm sorry, they are. While I have no doubt this place is active, I have looked around and quite frankly, not that many thread are THAT good. Sure they have pages of posts, but is it quality, is it anything of means? There ARE good bookers here, but the activeness of this site makes it seem better than it is. Just because there is threads being updated every day in the dozens, it does not mean it is a good BTB site.

A site I post at has no other shit like here. It has a Discussion Thread, Awards once a month, a BTB Newsletter at small periods throughout the year, and an advertisment thread. Apart from that, it is all threads. Sometimes there may be a lack of activity, but when there is, a lot of the threads have QUALITY writers. I'd hazard a guess a lot of them are better than some of the Hall of Famers here. That is not me being a killjoy, it is just what I maintain as fact, they are exceptional in every department.

Like I said, I'm not trying to bring a downer, but the notion that this is the best BTB site is a flawed one, because it quite truely is not. I was here a year or so ago, or some time ago when the forum underwent a complete upheavel, every section. I did not come back because although I posted, the quality was poor. I feel that would have been a good chance to start anew, create some new rules and put some disipline in plan, but that seemingly has not happened. Although there are some great guys, and only a few, the bad is outweighing the good. That's just my own opinion. I'm sure people are not interested in it, and I will be classed as a 'noob', but I can assure you, I am anything but. I'm only trying to give the Moderators a bit of an idea to make this forum a more quality place to post by weeding out the unwanted. (Not the bad bookers, just the guys that are here for thier own self gain, or not contributing to the section) :)