Barry Presents: Whodunnit 2: The West Smithton Sagas GAME THREAD

[Sky]

Just saying, this line of thinking of "You are reading me scum, therefore you are a complete idiot and everything you say is to be dismissed"... Doesn't feel like town Poyser. I feel like town Poyser assumes good faith

 

[Sky]

Whilst we’re here Sky, do you not have any thoughts on tweet’s flip flop from voting me to following me to voting me again?

Tweet has you as what we'd call a "yellow read". He votes you.

Someone comes out as a "red read" to Tweet. He votes that person. It's effectively independent of you voting him.

You develop into a "red read" for Tweet, and since you are the bigger threat as scum, he votes you.

It's not hard.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Just give sky a town read guys and she'll chuck one back at ya. --- not true



Why Poyser?



Why Mitch?

afaik, there's not many votes on Poyser (3 iirc). You stick on Tweet but don't ask Odo the same questions, who started the wagon (again, afaik). You also don't question sky.




Why would you lynch Poyser this early in the game?

Terrible point

It's a nothing wagon with 3 people voting.. or had 3 people, not sure anymore. I'd gladly lynch Poyser someday if he turns to be manipulative etc. But why so early?

If it's a nothing wagon, why is your entire first post about this 3 person wagon.

People hand town reads like candy, well be careful what you wish for. And never accept candy from a stranger, even if it's called "town lean".

You know guys, there is a button called "preview" and when i press it, i see the preview of the post and there are these 3 arrow shaped things.. or two.. and i just keep thinking it's dirt on my monitor but it's not. Can't we just have a nice blank color there?

fluff/nothingness

Here is why you first post is garbage @Banez , just ask me directly next time

 

[Poyser]

Just saying, this line of thinking of "You are reading me scum, therefore you are a complete idiot and everything you say is to be dismissed"... Doesn't feel like town Poyser. I feel like town Poyser assumes good faith

No, but when you make stupid points that is how I respond, yes. Notice how I haven’t engaged with the others reading me scum the same why I’ve engaged with you? That’s because you’re saying dumb shit which doesn’t illicit a conversation because they’re just baseless and ill thought out accusations and they’re actually giving me things to respond to.

 

[Tweet]

I never said you defended him? My theory is you followed me because you got nervous and then switched back once you realised nobody else followed me.
Your flip flop doesn’t really make sense because you vote me because you think my vote is a diversion, then you realise it isn’t and think I have a good point, then you randomly switch back because I “stopped pushing” him even though I never stopped pushing him because I was talking about him (alongside defending myself) the entire time

I voted with you for a second because I thought for a moment that you might have a point and wanted to reinforce the wagon to get a genuine reaction from Mitch, but then Mitch made another post where he completely no-sold you, which made me think he wasn't bothered by you at all, and you in turn no-sold that Mitch post yourself which made me think you weren't serious about your suspicions of Mitch to begin with, so I put my vote back on you.

This notion that I'm quite literally shitting my pants in fear of you and would go out of my way to appease you in particular is

 

[Poyser]

Tweet has you as what we'd call a "yellow read". He votes you.

Someone comes out as a "red read" to Tweet. He votes that person. It's effectively independent of you voting him.

You develop into a "red read" for Tweet, and since you are the bigger threat as scum, he votes you.

It's not hard.

Ok

now show me where he said any of this

 

[Sky]

No, but when you make stupid points that is how I respond, yes. Notice how I haven’t engaged with the others reading me scum the same why I’ve engaged with you? That’s because you’re saying dumb shit which doesn’t illicit a conversation because they’re just baseless and ill thought out accusations and they’re actually giving me things to respond to.

The thing is, you wouldn't be calling my points stupid if they supported your low hanging fruit diversion reads.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

V. Skybox said:
Just saying, this line of thinking of "You are reading me scum, therefore you are a complete idiot and everything you say is to be dismissed"... Doesn't feel like town Poyser. I feel like town Poyser assumes good faith


well that's just not true. Poyser, regardless of alignment, doesn't "assume" anything afaik

 

[Banez]

Here is why you first post is garbage @Banez , just ask me directly next time

What makes it a terrible point?

You're the one who mentioned lynch anyway, shouldn't throw that word around so quickly.

 

[Sky]

Ok

now show me where he said any of this

I'm just going through one possible thought process, because you seem to dismiss any thought process of Tweet's that would lead him to that voting pattern other than "SCUM!!!!1!!!"

 

[Poyser]

I voted with you for a second because I thought for a moment that you might have a point and wanted to reinforce the wagon to get a genuine reaction from Mitch, but then Mitch made another post where he completely no-sold you, which made me think he wasn't bothered by you at all, and you in turn no-sold that Mitch post yourself which made me think you weren't serious about your suspicions of Mitch to begin with, so I put my vote back on you.

This notion that I'm quite literally shitting my pants in fear of you and would go out of my way to appease you in particular is

except you’re a notorious busser and quite routinely get worried about looking bad off the back of your teammates to the point of trying to get ahead of the danger and wagoning them early. This is something you do basically every single time you’re scum. Not to mention you’re just straight up bullshitting about not being worried about “me in particular” when I’ve probably caught you more than anybody else lmao

 

[Banez]

And sure i could ask from them two same questions but i rather have as little interaction with either of them as possible.

 

[Poyser]

I'm just going through one possible thought process, because you seem to dismiss any thought process of Tweet's that would lead him to that voting pattern other than "SCUM!!!!1!!!"

No, I asked what you make of it. That doesn’t include inventing a thought process that he never hinted at to explain away something that contradicts your own feelings.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

What makes it a terrible point?

You're the one who mentioned lynch anyway, shouldn't throw that word around so quickly.

I said I would lynch if it came down to it, which at the time, with nothing else of value going on, is fine. You saying WHY WOULD LYNCH POYSER THIS EARLY is a terrible point because, if you read someone scum, you fucking lynch them regardless what their usename is or what day of the week it is.

 

[Sky]

Poyser no sellin' the need to claim even though he's dangerously close to lynch