- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 25,229
- Reaction score
- 673
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 45
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
So I've been toying with this idea for awhile and felt that this was the perfect time to get it off the ground. Basically what happens here is that I'll post a controversial statement to start us off and, provided you disagree with it, your job is to argue against it. This isn't a situation where there will be a winner or loser so much as one where you can all try and come together to look at the positive side of things. In a day and age where everyone is constantly griping about the product, perhaps this will be a breath of fresh air. Keep in mind, the statement I make each week is not necessarily my opinion, simply one that I feel will get your attention. So with that being said, here's this week's statement....
"Outside of his in-ring skills (selling, psychology, moveset), I really don't understand what the big deal about Dolph Ziggler is. I feel his mic work is simplistic and that he wouldn't be my first choice to hold a major title in WWE. What does this guy really have going for him (besides ring-work) that makes him a great PRO wrestler?"
Ready...set...go!
"Outside of his in-ring skills (selling, psychology, moveset), I really don't understand what the big deal about Dolph Ziggler is. I feel his mic work is simplistic and that he wouldn't be my first choice to hold a major title in WWE. What does this guy really have going for him (besides ring-work) that makes him a great PRO wrestler?"
Ready...set...go!