• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Reigns has potential to be great in the ring, the aspects I mention attest to that. So perhaps in the future he won't just have to rely on look when being a top face. Whereas Batista was only a moderately successful face due to his look.
I don't think he has potential because he's slightly quicker at doing his signature moves. Regardless of his ring skill, that won't change his position or what progresses his position, in my opinion. His look and the way he is booked will be the most important, just like Batista.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
I don't think he has potential because he's slightly quicker at doing his signature moves. Regardless of his ring skill, that won't change his position or what progresses his position, in my opinion. His look and the way he is booked will be the most important, just like Batista.
I understand you don't think it would make a difference apparently, but you don't think he has any potential as an in ring performer? You constantly say he's shown nothing or very little in the ring, but in the chances he has been given he has been entertaining as a wrestler.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
I understand you don't think it would make a difference apparently, but you don't think he has any potential as an in ring performer? You constantly say he's shown nothing or very little in the ring, but in the chances he has been given he has been entertaining as a wrestler.
He has potential to be better than Batista if that's what you're asking me... I can't and won't judge how good he'll be based on him performing his signature moves pretty well, but I do think he can be a good worker yeah. I think he has potential to be like Cena and get better and better the more he practices it, and eventually become a very good worker, but that's years into the future.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
He's already better than Batista ever was, and I would venture to guess most would agree with that?
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Union City, Tennessee
Reigns' (somewhat) superior athleticism compared to Batista is irrelevant to why I made the comparison between them. The fact is, the thing that is getting Reigns over and the thing that will keep him over and shoot him all the way to the top are the same traits that took Batista to the promised land - the Look combined with good marketability and good booking. And like others, I don't see Reigns as the man to take the throne from Cena as "face of the company" either. A huge player in the main event scene, no doubt, but not the premier superstar to lead the WWE for the next 5-6 years or so.