• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


#Raw Discussion Thread, Feb 6: Goldberg to answer Brock Lesnar’s WrestleMania challenge

Deezy

DZ PZ
Literally Kevin Owens befits. He hasn't held the belt sicne August to have to lose it to Goldberg. That in way befits him.

Also you're the one ranting that people have to deal with shit. You're saying people have to eat whatever WWE spoon-feeds them.
Start a hashtag about it
 

Kross Rhodes

Israel Has the Right to Exist
I didn't say anything's right, just said what was the most likely shit to happen from a business standpoint and that somehow degenerates into some kind of flame session of stooges and WWE defender.....Not even using stooge correctly.
Because you don't ever take a personal stand. You said multiple times it ain't about you. You only care about WWE.

Also that was in response to your childish use of gifs to shut down conversations.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
I didn't say anything's right, just said what was the most likely shit to happen from a business standpoint and that somehow degenerates into some kind of flame session of stooges and WWE defender.....Not even using stooge correctly.

Right. I don't know when or why shit hit the fan lol.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Does it have to? Could WWE have chosen not to have Goldberg interrupt KO and would G/L still be booked for 33?

Once again you're going off topic. The match is made end of story. Brock wants to take the title off Goldberg. End of story. You're literally going insane.
 

Kross Rhodes

Israel Has the Right to Exist
Once again you're going off topic. The match is made end of story. Brock wants to take the title off Goldberg. End of story. You're literally going insane.
No, his comment was the match made the most sense from a booking standpoint. Booking that match literally happened tonight. No booking for that match happened before tonight. Whatever.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
No, his comment was the match made the most sense from a booking standpoint. Booking that match literally happened tonight. No booking for that match happened before tonight. Whatever.

Ok because in WWE we've never seen people just come out and request title shots right
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
They didn't have to. You guys are ridiculous.

But they did. Look I can't have two arguments here. You don't think Brock should challenge for the title at mania so you change the argument to Goldberg shouldn't even challenge for the title in the first place.
 

Kross Rhodes

Israel Has the Right to Exist
My argument has never changed. It has been since minute one that the Lesnar and Goldberg match doesn't need the title. Period. Whether that be because the Fastlane match never had to be made or they find a way to keep the belt on KO. I also never said the Goldberg couldn't win the title. I merely put out a small post that said Lesnar could screw Goldberg out of the title. Everyone else refused to even say that was a possibility. I don't care anymore. You guys win.

:abandon:
 
Top