TT.Tiger tamer

[Dave Kingston]

On a related note, before I start writing my next show. I want to know what I can do to improve my style of writing and also a question regarding reviews.

Basically I thought my SD show was a flop and it was all over the place, I'm curious if I should nix writing in recap and to brave changing my format to full detailed shows.

I'm also curious about reviewing other peoples BTB's. I'm pretty paranoid when it comes to reviews ever since I used to write at WF, I must of wrote about 4-5 reviews and I didn't get a single one back. I wondered if I did start reviewing other peoples BTB's would I'd get a guaranteed review back. I don't think there's any point of me posting a show what took me about 6 hours to write and then basically getting it thrown in my face by getting no comments.

D.K

 

[The Anigma]

Personally, I prefer full-length matches over recaps but it only depends on what suits you and what you can do best. If you haven't ever written full-length matches then I suggest you slowly begin the transition from recaps to full-length matches. A way of doing this is to detail your recaps further and maybe work on one full-length match in your free time and when you get better then make the transition to full-length matches.

As far as reviews are concerned it's tough to get reviews nowadays. I could tell you to review others in order to get reviews but there is no guaranteed way of getting reviews. You just have to keep writing in hopes that your talents will be recognized and people will start to take notice of you. That's the best advice I could give you as far as getting reviews is concerned. Keep your writing on-point, remain active in the section and review other shows and you should get reviews returned.

 

[THE Renegade Diesel]

Anigma, what are your thoughts on the BTB section today, as to the one you left behind. I somewhat have a clue of what was happening then, such as BTW, PRIDE, and a few other good BTB's were going on.

 

[The Anigma]

The BTB section today is completely different from when I left eventhough it was only a couple months ago. It seems the BTB section is in a transitional period right now. When I left everyone knew where they were and where they were going but now it just seems like everyone, for the most part, is all over the place. At least that's the way I see it.

 

[THE Renegade Diesel]

Whoa, amazing words, from an amazing man :grin: lol. Anyways, I was thinking for my BTB. I have been wanting to write a full length pay per view, but haven't gotten around really. So I kind of waste no time going into pay per views. I usually do the standard four shows, then a ppv. Is four shows to little for proper build on a feud? I mean now that I think of it. The feuds will be somewhat rushed. Thoughts people?

 

[The Anigma]

In my opinion, four shows is just enough to start a rivalry and have a match at a PPV. I don't think it would be much of a problem in your BTB.

 

[THE Renegade Diesel]

A better idea

I've been thinking. What about a UFC btb. I mean you add some more unbelieveable elements. Have a fighter cut a promo, realistic interviews. Stuff like that. What are your thoughts people?

 

[Headfirst For Hardcore]

that seems like a great idea, and I'd give props to anyone who would do it. The only problem I'd find is the length of the fights, and actually keep things interesting without heels and faces, and gimmicks.

 

[The Anigma]

That's actually a good idea but I think it would be tough keeping things interesting using UFC for a BTB. If someone can do it then more power to them but I think it would be a bit difficult.

 

[Andrew~Walker]

I also think it would have to be someone with a very vast knowledge of MMA and to be able to accurately describe what is going on. Also you need to come to the realization that fighters cannot fight ever week so there is a conflict there because you will run into a roadblock in the end. I know I contemplated this but if someone else can make it work. I will definitely read

 

[THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps]

This isn't an original idea. I know someone was already in the works of making one, although I am not going to divulge who.

 

[Wordlife]

ahhhh its been said BKB, now you have to say who it is.... just kiddin you dont have to

All that aside, this is a cool idea, though it does seem a bit difficult. It would be a good read I can tell ya that much, but the matches could be hard to write. Promos though would be pretty sweet. I give all props to someone who does this

 

[PARANoIR]

Hey, to all of you that think you are helping a booker when you 'review' them with this AWFUL system you have here, have a look at this review and takes notes, and learn from them. You are helping no one with the system currently in place, let me tell you that for one.

Indeed. The review system here in my opinion hinders the forum big time in my opinion, simply because with such a mediocre review format in place, bookers don't improve as much as they potentially could because they're not getting any decent feedback of any real substance.

Funny thing is, that's probably one of WCW's shorter reviews.

 

[WCW Rules]

I prefer reading recaps, TBH. Full length matches on weekly shows is, IMO, a large waste of time. Not to mention, they're not even full length because what somebody writes in one paragraph doesn't necessarily equate to any concrete amount of in ring time. It's an estimation. I also prefer the storytelling aspect of booking, which is why I embrace recaps as they allow the story to be told without boring the readers with uninteresting and long matches. My philosophy towards weekly shows; they're used to further intensify and build storylines, nothing more, nothing less. The occasional 'great' match here and there, but I believe that's their purpose. Now, if the BTB is focused more so on wrestling, that's a different story, but still, they generally have PPVs anyway, so the philosophy can apply there as well. Kudos to the guys who can write long matches and still get their works done on time, though; I used to be able to do so, but not anymore, not with my unfortunate 'perfectionist' syndrome running about. This not only applies to my booking, but my other writing ventures as well.

On the subject of reviews, I always seem to run across a few that stray from mentioning the 'worst match' and 'worst promo,' especially pertaining to a veteran BTBer's thread. Why is this? Surely, their shows are not perfect, as nothing is, and the readers MUST find something wrong with an aspect of the show? I find it as kind of a cop out, readers inputting, 'N/A' where the worst promo or match should be. That's my only gripe, really. It does say, "Worst," not bad. People seem to get them mixed up, I think. Just because it's the worst, doesn't mean it's necessarily horrible. If the show is ENTIRELY quality, then the 'worst' must be somewhat adequate, or below average, but not bad.

 

[xtremebadass]

That would be hard as hell to write a match. Sure the kicks and the punches would be easy, but with the constant movement on the canvas, you have to know your shit. I bet if there was a UFC BTB, Brock Lesnar would be champ. lol