WWE Vs TNA

[Klide]

Well here we go since were all wrestling fans its time to rep your business. Every time i go on Youtube on my recommended vids theres a vid that say WWE vs TNA which one is better ive heard alot on youtube now its time to hear it on IWF!

Idk if this has been posted before if so Owell we have new faces which means new responses.

 

[LKP]

WWE is better than TNA because it has star power, money, a long history. That is just three Minor things in my mind.

 

[noumenon]

I've come to enjoy TNA a lot more than I have in the past recently, but I'll still take WWE any day. All my favorite wrestlers are there, along with most of the top talent.

 

[CenaMark54]

WWE of course;

1/ Better wrestling matches
2/ Better storylines
3/ Better stars
4/ John Cena
5/ Randy Orton
6/ Prestigious Belts
7/ Better production values
8/ History

 

[LKP]

Tna has two things wwe does not, which i want wwe to have. Good matches and Aj styles

 

[Klide]

Tna has two things wwe does not, which i want wwe to have. Good matches and Aj styles

I can agree with u about good matches we havent had a good match since micheals and taker the rest have been decent or terrible as for Aj styles herd of him but i dont watch TNA so idk.

WWE of course;

1/ Better wrestling matches
2/ Better storylines
3/ Better stars
4/ John Cena
5/ Randy Orton
6/ Prestigious Belts
7/ Better production values
8/ History

That pretty much summed everything

 

[LKP]

Well WWE have ahd a few good matches this year. But what im saying is TNA seem to have more than the wwe does. Even though the wwe is bigger. You would think it would be the other way around.

 

[Airfixx]

I can agree with u about good matches we havent had a good match since micheals and taker

So WWE matches suck? ...But you go on to agree with CenaMark that WWE
have better matches that TNA yet don't see AJ styles wrestle enough to have an opinion of him (thus, pressumably you don't even watch TNA)?

You couldn't have written a bigger load of reactionary, contradictory bullshit if you'd have sat and quizzed over it for a week!

 

[The Rated R CMStar]

You want to compare TNA to WWE and all they represent, watch their two latest Triple Threats. Im going to give you my toughts on both.

In TNA, you have Daniels vs Joe vs AJ. I had hear the praise for the original match and the reviews for their encounter and Turning Point, so I decided to watch the match. I'm sorry, didn't buy it. I was impressed and blown away by the spots they pulled, but in the end, it was a spot fest. A very impressive, fun spot fest, but a spotfest. They kept nailing a high impact move just to get back up and nail another one. And after all that, what finishes Joe up is...a moonsault.

Now, watch HHH vs HBK vs Cena. Far less flashy stuff in the ring, but they actually went in there and told a story and their fight looked as real as pro wrestling can look. Their high impact moves actually seemed to produce an effect on one another.


WWE beats TNA in every aspect production wise, and, if you ask me, unless it's a Kurt Angle or Desmond match, it also has better, more credible wrestling.



THAT, and the fact that TNA is WAY too smarky for my taste. I mean, Mike Tenay actually praised the quality of a match and how Daniels, Joe and AJ worked with one another on air. Not the extends the guys would go to win the match, no, he praised how they worked together and the match was living up to its hype.

 

[Kizza]

I enjoy TNA more than WWE, but tbh, that's just my tastes. Logically, WWE just shits on TNA, besides their womens division. It's always nice to get some competition in wrestling, but even with Hogan, TNA are nowhere near a WWE level, even where WWE were comparatively 15 years ago.

 

[MizMasta3000]

the fact that TNA is on WWE's radar after only being in the biz 7 or 8 years is great. WWE is ancient tbh and in the coming decade TNA will really be a problem for WWE

 

[monkeystyle]

Where's the option for I hate them both right now?

 

[monkeystyle]

1/ Better wrestling matches

I'll disagree on this one and call it a push. Both have their equal share of mostly garbage with a few gems thrown in.

2/ Better storylines

Neither company has written a real compelling story in a long time.

3/ Better stars

To a certain extent. The WWE's stars a bigger but they're more or less all the same guys.

4/ John Cena



5/ Randy Orton

Needs to suffer some sort of serious injury. Such an awful performer.

6/ Prestigious Belts

I will agree that the WWE seems to be working more on placing a higher value on the belts but they still don't mean as much as they should. TNA on the other hand doesn't seem to give a shit about the validity of their titles.

7/ Better production values

Hands down agree with this

8/ History

Meh, history means nothing. The present day product is all that matters.

 

[JMay187]

You guys want to know why TNA is so great.

NO JOHN CENA.

 

[The Rated R CMStar]

the fact that TNA is on WWE's radar after only being in the biz 7 or 8 years is great. WWE is ancient tbh and in the coming decade TNA will really be a problem for WWE

TBH, they aren't. If WWE stops their talent from going to TNA is to stop TNA from actually being on their radar.

Also...you are giving as a fact that TNA will be around for another decade..