WWE Vs TNA

[MizMasta3000]

hopefully so. You want them to "ECW"?

 

[JurassicBonez]

I've enjoyed TNA ALOT more than I have WWE this year. And that goes for all of WWE shows.

 

[Montana]

I think TNA had a better 2009. Impact is more entertaining than Raw as of late. TNA has been on better PPV's. Better fueds too.


1/ Better wrestling matches

THey have 6 hours of wrestling a week. As MS said, its about equal.

2/ Better storylines

What storylines would that be? Cena vs Orton XXXVII, disagree here

3/ Better stars

They have better stars, but are they used better?

4/ John Cena

He's not really improving the entertainment value on Raw or the PPV's, however he is the #1 draw in wrestling.

5/ Randy Orton

How many times are we going to see Orton vs Cena/HHH. THey finally put him against a new face in Koffi.

6/ Prestigious Belts

More of a historical thing

7/ Better production values

Both production values are fine.

8/ History

The WWE needs to hang onto their history, because the future isn't looking all that bright.

 

[Great One]

The one directed at my age group I think.

 

[Hometown Kid]

The WWE needs to hang onto their history, because the future isn't looking all that bright.

True facts.

TNA's not perfect by any means, but it runs circles over WWE's horrible excuse for a wrestling promotion. Even ECW has went in the tank as of late. Besides Shelton/Christian and Sheamus getting pushed, what is the point of watching these shows? It's a shame because WWE has some talent, but in the end, it's really the same formulaic crap. At least TNA gives you hope of improvement. Then again, a guy who can barely walk is World Heavyweight Champion and their other champ is....I like the guy, He's decent, but the super Cena stuff that sells his merchandise does not make him above average as a performer at all. He's just a glorified mid-card act that got super hot with overpushing. Same with Orton, only crazier and a lot shittier as a performer. TNA again, has more than a few problems, but their storylines...don't involve Hornswoggle. The worst they have is Shark Boy. >_>

 

[Beer Money Army]

I voted for WWE. WWE have Produce 2 kickass Matches this Year, Taker/HBK and Mysterio/Y2J from Bash. (by far Mysterio/Y2J storyline feud is the best for 2009 2nd might be Punk/Jeff Hardy)

while with TNA i Havent seen a kick ass match since Jarrett/angle 2 and Shelley/sabin but they arent on the level of those 2 wwe matches. I have yet to see any TNA PPv after Destination X. Against all Odds 2009 was horrible, Destination X was half of it and it was shithouse.

I have heard Lockdown wasnt great.

My problem with TNA is they book a new face or potential dude for 2-3 months then fuck it off, I.E. Matt morgan (i didnt dig him, but 2009 has been pushing him to the limits and after Bound For Glory it's just went down to the toilet. I don't get that as to why.) I know some People will say the same with Punk and Ziggler. But WWE still establish them are top 2 while TNA has just bunch Morgan with herandez in the tag team scene. Yay . I bet cha they will be the one taking british invasion belts and not beer money.

 

[Kizza]

Angle/Wolfe from Turning Point was pretty great.

 

[JurassicBonez]

Angle/Wolfe: Turning Point
Styles/Daniels/Joe: Turning Point
Angle/Styles: Super iMPACT
Morgan/Angle: Bound for Glory

The one's I remember off the top of my head from TNA recently.