WWE unifying two more titles?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
They just made that shiny new WWE Champioinship Belt last year, are they really going to get rid of it that quickly? Assume eventually they'll just do away with the WHC.
two belts is pro, its only Orton who makes it seem lame. Jericho, HHH always looked badass with both belts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowman1

The Kliq

Jobber
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
26
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Age
28
Location
UK
Hopefully they'll be unifying the IC and US belts and not just have a champion vs champion like they usually have. If they do you unify them then it would be great if they have an elimination chamber match for them instead of WWE World Heavyweight championship. This way they can have Brock Lesnar fight against whoever wins out of Randy Orton and John Cena at the Royal Rumble.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
This is like the third time this month that Crayo has posted news that's already been posted by someone else. :pity2:

On topic, I prefer two midcard belts as it gives people in the midcard more to do while still not over-saturating the roster with one too many belts. Two singles titles in the undercard is the perfect balance to me but whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cloud

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
Yes I get that D'Z. Missed my point I see. They should have ONE new belt already. I hate seeing them carry around both belts if there's only 1 championship. Its dumb.

The logic of a rematch for a title that is now unified with another all made my head spin for a little while is what I am saying. Cena never technically won the WWEWHC, as the ONE title is now known, so why does he get a rematch for it like he lost it? Thats what I am getting at. Its all due to the circumstances surrounding the unification I suppose. Sorry, just had the thought and wanted to mention it.

To be honest, I don't really understand why they half-unified the belts at TLC. They would have been much better off leaving it until 'Mania where, presumably, they'll combine the titles to make one. They should have just had the initial WHC vs WWE match there though.

Great news about the midcard belts, the combined belt will hopefully act as a WHC replacement - at least from a credibility standpoint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trip in the Head

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
To be honest, I don't really understand why they half-unified the belts at TLC. They would have been much better off leaving it until 'Mania where, presumably, they'll combine the titles to make one. They should have just had the initial WHC vs WWE match there though.

Great news about the midcard belts, the combined belt will hopefully act as a WHC replacement - at least from a credibility standpoint.
In 2001 when they first unified the belts: Chris Jericho won them at the December ppv and walked around with both belts. It wasn't until mania or right after that the champ got one belt. They are re-using history.
 

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
In 2001 when they first unified the belts: Chris Jericho won them at the December ppv and walked around with both belts. It wasn't until mania or right after that the champ got one belt. They are re-using history.

Never realised this. I hope the main event is better than it was that year, the match was shit and the crowd were dead. Storyline looked pish as well
 

Trip in the Head

Jester of Darkness
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
14,361
Reaction score
4,279
Points
0
Age
43
Location
Maine
In 2001 when they first unified the belts: Chris Jericho won them at the December ppv and walked around with both belts. It wasn't until mania or right after that the champ got one belt. They are re-using history.
LAME
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Never realised this. I hope the main event is better than it was that year, the match was shit and the crowd were dead. Storyline looked pish as well
We'll have to wait and see if they actually re-use the story. But if they are committed to it long term with one top belt they most likely will.
 

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
We'll have to wait and see if they actually re-use the story. But if they are committed to it long term with one top belt they most likely will.

Unless Orton goes over then they surely can't fuck up as much as they did putting Jericho/HHH on last over Hogan/Rock. Plus the storyline can't be anywhere near as bad as that dog shit (literally, with the champ picking it up)
 

F.R.I.E

Save_Us Frie.2.J
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
3,370
Reaction score
1,069
Points
0
Location
Parts Unknown
It's a good idea but I do want to see Ambrose as a champion. He probably won't win the match.
 

Nexus1

Jobber
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
58
Reaction score
16
Points
0
Age
26
Location
India
Website
wweforever.net
i would like to see IC Title as main title for mid card Wrestlers. it's just beautiful and shiny and glossy.:yes: