The IWC makes up an extremely small percentage of the WWE audience. You're talking like the spoilers spoil it for every fan.
People are always going to guess storylines on the internet. We all try to do it. If someone guesses right and posts it on a news site, why should they change the storyline? That's completely illogical. 5% of the audience have seen a guess of what may just happen. OH NO~!
Now let's see you twist those words exactly the same way you twisted Roxxi's so that you can make another post of illogical gibberish.
Explain to me exactly how I twisted his words?
He said wwe changes their storylines after they are leaked, just because some fans already know about it.
I didn't twist that at all. That's exactly what I said he said. What he said is true. WWE DOES change their storylines after they are leaked on most occasions.
Nobody is arguing about that, we all know that.
But, what I am arguing about is, him saying that that is a dumb move by WWE/Vince. How is it a dumb move? If they have a good storyline, and it gets spoiled, and they have an alternative that is just as good, why not do that, so it's a shock to everyone? Makes sense to me.
And the second one, which you so kindly quoted, doesn't "twist his words" either. What I said is true. Christian's storyline about supposedly being the one who attacked Jeff was just a rumor.
There's no need to get bent out of shape going "Oh man, we could've had Christian vs Jeff, but Vince changed it", because it was just a rumour.
In fact, now that I think about it, I doubt there was any credibility to that report of Christian vs Jeff anywyas, considering it came out while Christian was under contract to TNA, and they (the reports) were talking as if it was a done deal.