Which were you?Too funny. A bible thumping heel and a porno star, home wrecking face. Thats a simile for my reality if I ever heard one.
Which were you?Too funny. A bible thumping heel and a porno star, home wrecking face. Thats a simile for my reality if I ever heard one.
LOL, not me exactly, but I think most bible thumpers are heels (sorry) and most porno stars are awesome. I wish I had that job. :gusta:Which were you?
I hope Orton got NO votes lol. From champion to nothing thats what he deserves. :henry:
Me likeyI don't mind him challenging here and there for the world title but he could be used to help prop up the stature of the IC Championship IMO. A former world champion and huge star like him wearing the IC gold would do wonders for the title.
Good point too, maybe all the undercard belts (well US is the only other) will get more attention now as bigger stars end up with them
Ya, the crowd on RAW this week was amazing with the Daniel Bryan and YES! chants lolI'm not just saying this because I am a mark of his but I truly think next year is the year we get a real Daniel Bryan run. After 2 years of chasing the title to have it ripped away, he will come back for it. He has plenty of momentum coming out of the Slammys.
take it a step further and ax the US Title. Not only does this force WWE to book feuds with something behind them other than "i wantz ta belt!' it adds prestige to both the WWE and IC title and gives more incentive to properly book the tag team division. Less is definitely more when it comes to championship belts in wrestling.That's my thinking. With one less championship to book for, that makes the divisions for all the singles titles (WWE, IC, US) a little bit stronger. Guys like Orton, Sheamus, Del Rio, even Mark Henry can now add to the competition for the Intercontinental and United States Championships instead of just the WHC.
Back to the original belt lineup basicallytake it a step further and ax the US Title. Not only does this force WWE to book feuds with something behind them other than "i wantz ta belt!' it adds prestige to both the WWE and IC title and gives more incentive to properly book the tag team division. Less is definitely more when it comes to championship belts in wrestling.
WWE TitleBack to the original belt lineup basically
Now now I wouldn't go THAT far. Sometimes they be nice to look atWWE Title
IC Title
Tag Team titles
what more do you need? Get rid of the divas division completely obviously
I didn't say get rid of women in wrestling. They can be used for valets, girlfriend angles, backstage interviewers, perhaps even ring announcers, ect.Now now I wouldn't go THAT far. Sometimes they be nice to look at
That's why you use them as valetsNow now I wouldn't go THAT far. Sometimes they be nice to look at