@Chris Semantics aside about whether there should be a triple crown or grand slam without a Women's IC belt, I'm not sure why my being confused by WWE calling what would typically be the Triple Crown, with only three qualifying belts, a Grand Slam, warrants this. It's just a confusing proposition. Excuse me for for being confused for a minute. I caught myself and edited it in before you said anything so I don't appreciation the response.
Grim was being super serious. Like he legit cared about proving that point even though I said over and over I already agreed to say whatever WWE wants. From the very first post.
Cwalker said he didn't understand the argument. I explained what it was. But I said in every post if WWE wanted to change the rules for women so be it. What I said still applies to the men. Showing receipts from wiki means you're serious enough about it to try and prove it.Got more of a serious vibe from you when you posted a couple paragraphs explaining why it was important for a midcard title to be included. He just posted some receipts from wiki, but it still don't matter
You knew what you were trying to do when you baited me into replying.
205 Live, boy.
