WWE Reportedly Confident That TNA Star Sting Will Be Joining Their Roster Soon

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,190
Reaction score
2,535
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Quote by Good Ol' JR

“@DomDAleo7: @JRsBBQ what are your thoughts on the @Sting rumors?
You mean the reoccurring ones we've been hearing since WCW closed?

Pretty much sums this thread up.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Messages
193
Reaction score
1
Points
18
If it's happening than it's going to be soon to set up Taker vs Sting WM30 If it's not to fight undertaker there's no point in signing sting. Having a sting vs a young guy match is pointless. I think that WWE needs to sign him before he retires I would like a Taker match and a WWE title run maybe just a month to say he carried it

If it's happening than it's going to be soon to set up Taker vs Sting WM30 If it's not to fight undertaker there's no point in signing sting. Having a sting vs a young guy match is pointless. I think that WWE needs to sign him before he retires I would like a Taker match and a WWE title run maybe just a month to say he carried it
 

John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,190
Reaction score
2,535
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
If it's happening than it's going to be soon to set up Taker vs Sting WM30 If it's not to fight undertaker there's no point in signing sting. Having a sting vs a young guy match is pointless. I think that WWE needs to sign him before he retires I would like a Taker match and a WWE title run maybe just a month to say he carried it

If it's happening than it's going to be soon to set up Taker vs Sting WM30 If it's not to fight undertaker there's no point in signing sting. Having a sting vs a young guy match is pointless. I think that WWE needs to sign him before he retires I would like a Taker match and a WWE title run maybe just a month to say he carried it

What's your definition of soon? Taker usually doesn't return until after Royal Rumble. Not that I believe it is happening.
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
139,458
Reaction score
39,394
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
Signing Sting wouldn't really have nothing to do with him wrestling. He is a major star from the WCW they haven't been able to fully exploit for DVD sales. They like 15 years of Sting material ripe for DVD usage, get him to say a few things on them. He can go on Legends of Wrestling roundtable (if that is still a thing) and this is a major reason you get Sting. Facing Undertaker is a pipe dream people have only been having just because of a vignette and a cool fan made poster.
 

AF.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
2,088
Reaction score
27
Points
48
I see this thread once a year lol