Now I'm confused about what you're asking and whyI just feel like I'm missing the relevance of them being on linear ESPN. Like I get culturally that is a thing to people that remember ESPN how they used to be, but it just seems to me like that's explicitly only relevant to ESPN content schedulers and old people that refuse to use streaming services they already get for free with cable.
So if you already have cable it's a deal for you, but not bc it's on linear, just bc you get the app, assuming you were canceling cable anytime soon. If you cancel cable then you got a pay the $30.

I mean, if I'm understanding you I would just say that the linear ESPN channel still has some prominence and name value to people over the age of 25, and I'd say it's a relevant clarification. Like, it's a much bigger deal for your sport/league/company to air on actual ESPN, than it is to be streamed on ESPN+. Being on ESPN+ is good, it means you have distribution and your fans can access you. But being on actual ESPN means millions being exposed to you everyday, fans or not. You'll be on the TVs in bars, restaurants, barber shops, etc. So for the purposes of a negotiation and a press release, I would consider it pretty relevant. But again, I most likely am completely missing your point.
