- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 25,256
- Reaction score
- 706
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 45
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
Hilarious arguments last nights guys, wish I could have been here to see them live.
Anyhow, my two cents on the key arguments...
Roman turning heel at the expense of Ambrose is probably the best way to go if they want that to be their key feud for the next couple of months. First of all, Roman becoming the corporate champ, like The Rock in the past, will allow him to become face later on in a much more organic way. The fans will naturally start cheering him down the road and then WWE can turn him and make the fans think that it was their doing. Meanwhile, they've set up Ambrose with an injury angle and a fairly tough go to the finals. He'll have to beat Dolph, who will most likely lose when Breeze interferes after a hard fought match to set up their angle. Then he'll have to go through Owens, who will "injure" him even more. When he meets Reigns in the finals, he'll give it his all and never give up despite his horrible injury and eventually Roman will have to cheat to win, thereby making him an ultra dick and Ambrose the most sympathetic babyface on the roster.
At least that's how I'd do it, so they'll probably go the opposite and have Triple H come out to cost Reigns the title and reveal Ambrose as the new corporate guy even though that makes zero sense.
In regards to the beat down last night from the BoD, that's all it was. Besides, they were just there to give the Manchester crowd something to go home happy with and seeing that it may be 'Taker's last appearance(s) in England, I think that's fine. They can always sell the Wyatt's ineffectiveness on the fact that they were shocked Kane and Undertaker came back so soon, or maybe they were shocked because their boss really didn't steal their souls. Either way, 'Taker and Kane getting the advantage in a non-match situation is fine. Things would be different if they were in a match and couldn't double team all the time, so I don't think it really made the Wyatt's look like pussies.
Anyhow, my two cents on the key arguments...
Roman turning heel at the expense of Ambrose is probably the best way to go if they want that to be their key feud for the next couple of months. First of all, Roman becoming the corporate champ, like The Rock in the past, will allow him to become face later on in a much more organic way. The fans will naturally start cheering him down the road and then WWE can turn him and make the fans think that it was their doing. Meanwhile, they've set up Ambrose with an injury angle and a fairly tough go to the finals. He'll have to beat Dolph, who will most likely lose when Breeze interferes after a hard fought match to set up their angle. Then he'll have to go through Owens, who will "injure" him even more. When he meets Reigns in the finals, he'll give it his all and never give up despite his horrible injury and eventually Roman will have to cheat to win, thereby making him an ultra dick and Ambrose the most sympathetic babyface on the roster.
At least that's how I'd do it, so they'll probably go the opposite and have Triple H come out to cost Reigns the title and reveal Ambrose as the new corporate guy even though that makes zero sense.
In regards to the beat down last night from the BoD, that's all it was. Besides, they were just there to give the Manchester crowd something to go home happy with and seeing that it may be 'Taker's last appearance(s) in England, I think that's fine. They can always sell the Wyatt's ineffectiveness on the fact that they were shocked Kane and Undertaker came back so soon, or maybe they were shocked because their boss really didn't steal their souls. Either way, 'Taker and Kane getting the advantage in a non-match situation is fine. Things would be different if they were in a match and couldn't double team all the time, so I don't think it really made the Wyatt's look like pussies.
:
