WS Mafia VI: End of an Era - GAME THREAD

[Canadian Dragon]

its fine junk, just re-read from the beginning and re-focus on making town reads if you're town. i dont want any easy mislynches if we can avoid them so let's all pull our dresses/pants/leggings/wtv he fuck you want to wear up and lets attempt to not waste too much time on petty squabbles

 

[Doddsy]

Considering I'm the first vote on Junk (right)

I don't really think it's opportunstic to steer in another direction and abandon the wagon I was just on

Maybe we have a different definition of what that means

Timing of it was mostly the alarm bell causer. I'm not hard sus on it, as I said before the PR and such buy you more leeway

wth,
Chris rolled scum.

I used my one shot insane cop ability on you.
Insane cop means that the result is the opposite.
I got town on you so that means you are scum this time.

Had this quoted to ask about but I see that was wasted effort

 

[Junkette]

Not sure how I feel about TFW piggybacking Sky with the reason “Oh you questioned Junk better then I could” that statement seems very untrue of yourself TFW. I think you could’ve easily questioned me just as well as Sky did but you didn’t and now appear to be feigning the fact you can’t do that well? That thought process seems odd and contrived to me. Thoughts anyone?

You know what, screw your thoughts since you all think i’m a scumvag rn anyways.
Vote TFW

I quoted the reason.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Timing of it was mostly the alarm bell causer. I'm not hard sus on it, as I said before the PR and such buy you more leeway



Had this quoted to ask about but I see that was wasted effort

can you explain why the pr buys them leeway?

 

[Sky]

Are you just gonna read my posts as suspicious no matter what for the foreseeable future? Cause if that’s the case then our interaction is done and you can vote me without distracting me with suspicion on every post I make.

Well if you get your shit together and start basing your votes on posts you see with your own eyes, you'll be fine. From what I've seen so far that's a big if though

 

[Marty McFourth]

I really hate that 4th role is true to tpein is literally a dart throw to solve. im stuck on extremely likely town landmine or extremely excellent fake

Just read me off play, broski

Getting too caught up on what I am is not really going to help you

 

[Junkette]

its fine junk, just re-read from the beginning and re-focus on making town reads if you're town. i dont want any easy mislynches if we can avoid them so let's all pull our dresses/pants/leggings/wtv he fuck you want to wear up and lets attempt to not waste too much time on petty squabbles

I guess I’ll do that now then.

 

[Chris]

not to be stickler, but he didnt say that till after i said it. so i cant really give him town points for parroting here (no disrespect intended to 4th)

and sure, ill be more blunt. what do you think about sky

Oh fair enough on TFW then. Him being the only one so far mentioning not being able to claim character is still weird too, especially when characters aren't AI and his is obvious anyway

And I kinda like Sky going HAM on Junk, but the back and forth about whether she was thinking for herself or not felt like a lot of going in circles lol but it did remind me of the one i had with her that was like that last game and she was town then so I think she just latches on that stuff

 

[Junkette]

Well if you get your shit together and start basing your votes on posts you see with your own eyes, you'll be fine. From what I've seen so far that's a big if though

LMAO fair.

 

[Marty McFourth]

I just wanted too start my game and start interacting, I didn’t feel like reading back yet and still don’t cause this convo is good for reads. Sorry not Sorry I guess.

Well, alright

I'll give you time to read back, interact and form some proper reads

I'd like to hear your own take on Haza and any other reads you may have

 

[Junkette]

Hard reading Sky town now btw, so call me crazy but what I did worked in getting me a good solid read.

You can be excused for doubting the glittery obe Junkette Sparkles (sparkles if my username on MafC for reference lmao).

 

[Junkette]

Well, alright

I'll give you time to read back, interact and form some proper reads

I'd like to hear your own take on Haza and any other reads you may have

I mean I’ve literally formed two reads by myself already, a town read on Sky and a scum lean on you, but yeah I’ll get back to you re: Haza in a bit.

 

[Chris]

Hard reading Sky town now btw, so call me crazy but what I did worked in getting me a good solid read.

You can be excused for doubting the glittery obe Junkette Sparkles (sparkles if my username on MafC for reference lmao).

Wait what lol so was your plan to say you hadn't read anything to see who comes at you?

 

[Marty McFourth]

I will admit what Haza did might fall in to the too scummy to be scum category though perhaps

Especially with the doubling down, It's really not a good reason to want to lynch somebody for the day

Nothing else striked me as scummy so far though, so ya

I'll be patient for more folks to chat up, not lost upon me I was wrong on haza d1 last game and I kind of agree w 4th that it may fall into the "too openly scummy of a statement to be scum" box.

@Jeff Valley Driver Explain. You say I parroted you but yet here you are saying you agree with my post, I'm

I don't recall parroting your post to say that, I just thought about it as I was interacting with Haza and reading his posts

 

[Sky]

Going to look at the TFW case, which as far as I can tell seems to be just this post.

Not sure how I feel about TFW piggybacking Sky with the reason “Oh you questioned Junk better then I could” that statement seems very untrue of yourself TFW. I think you could’ve easily questioned me just as well as Sky did but you didn’t and now appear to be feigning the fact you can’t do that well? That thought process seems odd and contrived to me. Thoughts anyone?

I wouldn't say this is an indicator of anything. I myself have said "this poster said it already and better than I could" numerous times because, why waste time having the same argument again?