WS Christmas Mafia 2022

[Sister Abigail]

What I mean is that you seem to be putting Juice out there as your one talking point and that's it. Granted I might be wrong on this since I'm at best skimming the thread but it seems to me like most of the time that I notice you posting, it's about your town read on her.

Just going through an iso of Smark and came across this. Tweet had another post like this as well with Smark. I think Tweet can have some townie points for now.

 

[Sister Abigail]

Things I haven't liked from Smark:

- Lots of fluff
- Soft pushes
- Defense of Juice,
- The whole suss on people talking about food, despite being one themselves, and then the defense of it was weak (Chris and Tommy both called this out)
- Giving Ekko a town read because he said too much food talk and apparently is not 'deviating' from town Ekko
- Later in D1 mentions how Ekko's brain is working like it did last time he was town, which is something that's tough from a perspective of someone that doesn't know him all that well considering what he can do as any faction
- Lots of focus on the duel and its partcipants
- No reads at all until late (except Ekko being town ha)
- Said they would get to rereading Ekko's post and I feel like the 'reread' felt fake and didn't really help anything. Waste of energy just to look productive
- Post 1074 just pings the shit out of me
- Don't buy the claim out of nowhere at all


Things I have liked from Smark:

...


Not really a lot to like from this slot at all. I think Smark has done very little scum hunting and has instead focused most of their conversation on Ekko and Juice as individuals, as well as their duel. I don't buy Smark's town read of Ekko at all. Now that doesn't mean Ekko can't be town, but I don't see the reason as to why Smark should believe that based on what Smark has said about Ekko. Just not anything from this slot despite the early high post count. I'm fine if this slot is lynched.

 

[Sister Abigail]

I won't put a vote there yet because I'm still pretty uninformed in this game.

 

[Sister Abigail]

like i said before to people - if you town read me and Ekko both - you can force a draw. Funnily though - a lot of people voting Ekko claim they aren't really sure - but will still vote.

STOP THE CAP! DING DONG !

This is a weird thing to say for someone who challenged Ekko for apparently little reason. Is this you getting cold feet?

 

[Smart Marx]

I was on 6 votes. That wasn’t a claim out of nowhere.

 

[Smart Marx]

And Ekko and Juice is the main clash of the phase.

My reread solidified my desire to keep my duel vote on Ekko to win. That’s the only reason for that so mission accomplished.

 

[Wang Chung]

Teaches me to work 11 hours and come back to 1100 posts.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

 

[Smart Marx]

Also, why does the non-game related post addressing Juice’s reaction to CP ping you?

 

[Smart Marx]

For the record I found the post I was referring to from CP and it’s best to leave it.

 

[CakeWalker]

the best thing to do with 88 Dogwhistles - is to take a can of petrol and light those motherfuckers up in flames!

 

[Sister Abigail]

I saw a couple of posters say Tommy was townie. Did a quick iso and I'd give him some townie points as well.

 

[CakeWalker]

 

[Sister Abigail]

I was on 6 votes. That wasn’t a claim out of nowhere.

Still don't buy the claim at all.

 

[Smart Marx]

Still don't buy the claim at all.

That’s fine.

 

[Sister Abigail]

Also, why does the non-game related post addressing Juice’s reaction to CP ping you?

I didn't find it non-game related? Maybe I just misread it. But not sure why you're trying to bring up any 'questionable stuff' in past games to somehow justify a point that apparently doesn't matter then? Seems like you're just dropping confusion there for little reason.