Dean Ambrose is the best.
However I felt he really got held back a lot, they wanted Dean Ambrose to have sort of a crazy gimmick, but the way they wrote him just came off as silly, or "wacky" I guess, which didn't work out all that well. Dean Ambrose can do crazy, he did it very well as Jon Moxley but WWE won't let him bring that side out.
I don't get the hate for Roman Reigns when it really shouldn't be on him. Part of it is annoying smarks who get mad when something doesn't go the way they want it to go, and part of it is WWE's writing. He's said some dumb stuff in promos, but I don't see how anyone couldn't see that it was terrible writing on WWE's part and not something he wrote himself. You can tell he has a lot of natural charisma if they'd just let him do his own thing, but WWE insists on him being the next John Cena, so people are stuck with that.
But those are just my opinions which probably don't matter seeing as I don't even watch anymore.
However I felt he really got held back a lot, they wanted Dean Ambrose to have sort of a crazy gimmick, but the way they wrote him just came off as silly, or "wacky" I guess, which didn't work out all that well. Dean Ambrose can do crazy, he did it very well as Jon Moxley but WWE won't let him bring that side out.
I don't get the hate for Roman Reigns when it really shouldn't be on him. Part of it is annoying smarks who get mad when something doesn't go the way they want it to go, and part of it is WWE's writing. He's said some dumb stuff in promos, but I don't see how anyone couldn't see that it was terrible writing on WWE's part and not something he wrote himself. You can tell he has a lot of natural charisma if they'd just let him do his own thing, but WWE insists on him being the next John Cena, so people are stuck with that.
But those are just my opinions which probably don't matter seeing as I don't even watch anymore.