Who is the bigger star?......Reigns or Ambrose

[Stopspot]

Ambrose is the obvious star of the two.

Reigns has nothing outside of muscles. He's been booked to shit since the singles push started. We talk about midcarders being damaged goods. But Roman is the king of the junkpile

 

[edge4ever]

No one is walking out with the WWE title considering it's not on the line at fast lane. But, Ambrose dropping the IC title means 1 of 2 things.... Ambrose will win the triple match and face triple h. Or, they're setting him up for something else big like battling taker. Either way, things should look good for Dean at this years mania. He didn't just drop the belt to KO for no reason.

 

[Crayo]

Can hardly fault the company on Reigns, remember when Cena got fucking massacred by Lesnar and left in a heap at Summerslam 2014 that people on here predicted that "They're building up Brock so that Roman Reigns can conquer him at 'Mania!" and most of everyone (sans @Crayo) were SOOOOO down with that. Then it happened

if you're on social media - like everyone - or do a google search about wrestling, the business will be exposed to you. Come on, son.

I remember the huge circle jerk for Roman Reigns on here. I got so much heat.

 

[Neptune]

I still think it is funny how people were all about Roman when his first push was happening and not no one really cares because how what they did to his characters. I have said since day one Seth > Ambrose > Reigns and my opinion has not changed even 4 years later.

 

[Rogue]

One character is bland, and whenever he does talk he might as well have lines written on his arm like his cousin.

The other is soooo cooky, HE'S A LUNATIC! WHAT'S HE GONNA DO NEXT!? Come out in a vehicle like he has done three times before? Go CRAZY on someone and elbow them through a table?

It's easy to dislike one or the other when their characters come across with little authenticity. They've added extra layers to Ambrose to make him a little more serious, but then take it away when they coin one of his moves the wackyline.

Even when Rollins was on he was a shit heel, he could hold his own in the ring but that was his last resort. His reign started becoming just lousy near the end. The injury was a blessing in disguise tbh. Now he comes back with a readjusted character and he'll be fresh to everyone again.

 

[Snowman1]

Side note, thanks Shadow: When an Ambrose match is on PLEASE put a muzzle on Michael Cole.

Or just... Put one on now and save a lot of trouble. :dawg:

 

[Rogue]

At least with Mauro he'd probably call it a rebound lariat, but nooooo, Ambrose can't be on Smackdown. Gotta make room for a Big Show main event.

 

[Mr. Roman Empire]

Seth Rollins is the only real answer to this discussion 3::dealwithit:4:2::

 

[Joseph86]

In terms of popularity , I would say Ambrose. Reigns on the other hand has better in ring talent

 

[Crayo]

In terms of popularity , I would say Ambrose. Reigns on the other hand has better in ring talent

2:

 

[Snowman1]

At least with Mauro he'd probably call it a rebound lariat, but nooooo, Ambrose can't be on Smackdown. Gotta make room for a Big Show main event.

"It's the Lunatic Fringe! He's crazy! How can you gameplan for Ambrose!? Even Ambrose doesn't know what he's thinking! He's a deranged lunatic! He's a madman! He's crazy! Everything will go to hell if he wins the title! Could you imagine a world with a champion Ambrose? Ambrose is crazy! He's Dangerous! OH MY! It's the Lunatic Lariat Maggle! How did he bounce off the ropes like that!?"

Fuck these three. Lucha Underground, Wednesday nights. 9 PM